My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150331 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
C150331 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 1:11:00 PM
Creation date
3/29/2012 8:13:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150331
Contractor Name
North Delta Irrigation Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
40
County
Delta
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ken Nelson <br />December 20, 201' 1 <br />Page 5 <br />The debris pile at the tunnel's failure has been inspected and is described by the ditch rider and <br />other NDIC representatives, as ceding or roof failure, Descriptions of cobble rock debris and tunnel <br />structure do not indicate horizontal movement, but rather, failure of the tLIMICI roof span. There is <br />no obvious evidence of Subsidence at the ground surface above the tunnel in the vicinity I of the <br />horizontal movement. Ibis is of particular importance, because residential development exists <br />directly above the tunnel. <br />The tunnel should not be placed in service until debris is •emove(], and the tunnel is reinforced to <br />prevent a recurrence of the 2011 irrigation season shut-down. The NDIC has indicated that <br />alternatives for tunnel repair do not need to provide for future physical access into the funnel for <br />routine inspections or maintenance, however, inspection manholes should be considered. <br />Open Ditches. The majority component of the SUI jCCt canal system consists of open ditches, hand <br />excavated into native soils. A combined 7,640 lineal foot length of dirt lined ditch is encompassed <br />within the study reach. This includes a short 460-foot length of ditch between the inlet of the <br />inverted siphon and the outlet portal of the tunnel with one (1) headgate. The remaining length of <br />ditch is approximately 7,180 lineal feet, and located between the tunnel and 2100 Road, It includes <br />two bridges and one culvert for cross vehicular access, an overflow structure, and two (2) headgates. <br />Observations along the segments of ditch that were shut down during the 2011 irrigation season <br />indicate that the flowline slope is inconsistent with low points and/or reverse slope. This is not <br />uncommon for early 1900's construction, since the overall slope is very nominal at 0.04% <br />(4314 inch in 1,000 feet). <br />With few exceptions, the ditch is excavated into an existing hillside with side slopes along the canal <br />north bank, and overburden placed on the southern, down-slope ditch bank that provides a narrow <br />bench for limited maintenance and vehicular access. An approximate 1-mile stretch of the ditch <br />upstream from the tunnel is along very steep embartknient that rises upwards of 100-feet between <br />the river bottom and the plateau above. This segment of ditch was constructed about 20- to 30-feet <br />above the toe of the lower bench of the river bottom. There are several isolated areas of roadway <br />erosion of this segment of the canal that should be repaired, Near the cast tunnel portal, narrow <br />cracks at the road surface are a potential precursor of" a weakness that could fail in the future. <br />Although the NDIC has not experienced ditch overflow leading to a catastrophic breach and <br />substantial erosion along the steep embankment, such an event could cause future seasonal shut <br />down of the canal system, and related emergency reconstruction. <br />The segment of the canal Upstream from the tunnel to the bridge at 2100 Road supports a prolific <br />growth of filamentous algae or moss, Other segments of the ditch system appear to be unaffected. <br />Aquatic vegetation requires several chemical treatments and/or harvesting each season. The <br />chemical herbicide currently used, Hydrothol 191, is reportedly not regulated or considered toxic to <br />aquatic life at low doses, therefore, tailwater can be discharged to the Gunnison River. The <br />herbicide label indicates that the product is highly corrosive, and may not be fully compatible with <br />crop irrigation immediately following application, depending on the dosage. This seasonal <br />maintenance is also relatively costly. If aqLiatic weed control is not conducted or is postponed, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.