My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning for Drought May 2000
CWCB
>
Drought Mitigation
>
DayForward
>
Planning for Drought May 2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2012 4:27:16 PM
Creation date
1/26/2012 4:10:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Drought Mitigation
Title
Planning for Drought
Date
5/1/2000
Description
Draft Planning for Drought document
Basin
Statewide
Drought Mitigation - Doc Type
Drought Planning Document
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Few communities have done any serious drought <br /> planning. The CWCB recently contacted water <br /> providers that produce 2,000 acre-feet or more of Water Management Tools <br /> treated water per year to determine the extent and <br /> level of drought planning in Colorado. We asked if Master Water Supply Plan-a projection of future <br /> they had a master water supply plan, a hydrology demand for water in a specific service area under various <br /> study that considered the risk of drought, a drought development scenarios and an analysis of the technical, <br /> financial,and economic feasibility of various alternative <br /> response plan, a water conservation plan, and if they options to develop a reliable supply of water to meet the <br /> had adopted an ordinance that prescribes water long-term demand. <br /> conservation in times of drought. The results from • <br /> 67 municipalities showed that less than half (49%) Hydrology Study-an analysis of the firm supply of water <br /> had done some form of drought planning. 53% had to a system that considers the physical availability of <br /> a master water supply plan, 22% had a hydrology water, including the risk of severe,sustained drought,and <br /> the relative priority of the legal water rights to divert water <br /> study considering drought, 22% had a drought for beneficial use. <br /> response plan, 74% had a water conservation plan, <br /> and 36% had a water conservation ordinance. In Drought Response Plan—a document that describes an <br /> reviewing the hydrology studies, only about 4% agreed upon process to assess periodically water supply <br /> included a robust, risk based drought analysis. conditions and the options for responding to emerging <br /> drought based on pre-defined deficiencies or triggers. <br /> Many water utilities appear to have designed their <br /> water systems assuming an average year supply. Water Conservation Plan-a formal plan to encourage <br /> all customers to use water more efficiently by <br /> systematically considering a wide range of specific <br /> ID Master Water Supply Plan water-saving measures. <br /> El Drought Hydrology Study <br /> ❑Drought Response Plan Water Conservation Ordinance-a regulatory measure <br /> ❑Water Conservation Plan adopted by local governments designed to encourage <br /> in Water Conservation Ordinance water use efficiency. <br /> •y• 80%/ A true risk based drought analysis of surface water <br /> `1) 70°i °Io supplies requires the use of sophisticated <br /> PP q P <br /> °- 60% mathematical techniques to define stream flow <br /> • 50% characteristics during low-flow periods. This <br /> 40% o F analysis is possible now due to recent advances in <br /> 30% / V : j computers. Drought severity is a function of <br /> a 20% / duration (in months or years) and the magnitude of <br /> 10% the deficits. A deficit is the difference or shortage <br /> 0%- in volume between the demand and total available <br /> Municipalities supply, including storage, for a given increment of <br /> time (typically a month). The design drought is a <br /> planning tool to describe a monthly or annual series <br /> of low flows. It can be based on the recorded . <br /> The CWCB is developing new design drought historic drought experienced in the region, but it is <br /> parameters based on risk analysis. What is difficult to determine the level of risk due to the <br /> needed are estimates of drought characteristics, limited length of recorded data. A better technique <br /> such as duration and percent of average is to estimate drought characteristics from a <br /> precipitation or stream flow, by major river basin or statistical analysis of available stream flow or <br /> climatic region. With such information, planners precipitation records with long term "synthetic" <br /> would have a better idea about what is needed to stream flow histories using stochastic models. The <br /> survive a drought, and current attitudes disputing synthetic stream flow histories maintain the <br /> the need for reservoir storage might change. monthly, seasonal, and annual characteristics of the <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.