My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Let Market Approaches Cure the By-pass Floiw Controversy
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
Let Market Approaches Cure the By-pass Floiw Controversy
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2012 2:12:23 PM
Creation date
11/1/2011 2:47:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2001
Description
Let Market Approaches Cure the By-pass Floiw Controversy
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> budget deficits in many of the last 35 years have caused great fluctuation in funding. <br /> So while 24.5 billion dollars could have been appropriated from the fund since 1965, <br /> only 11.4 billion has been authorized. <br /> The Bush administration, taking advantage of the large governmental <br /> surpluses has announced that it will seek full funding for the entire 900 million dollar <br /> LWCF authorization. In addition the proposed Conservation and Reinvestment Act <br /> Fund (CARA Fund), if passed plans an additional 900 million dollar annual <br /> expenditure, with half of these funds (also derived from off shore oil and gas leases) <br /> set aside for state administered grants. <br /> Though the funds exist, federal land mangers have voiced some skepticism <br /> about Colorado's eligibility to participate in these programs for water acquisition. <br /> The expressed concerns involve a requirement that the federal government retain title <br /> to any acquired water rights used for instream flow purposes. The land managers <br /> seem confused by the prohibition in state law that restricts ownership of an instream <br /> flow to the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB). While it is true that only <br /> CWCB can own instream flow water rights, the same statute allows parties to donate <br /> acquired water rights to the CWCB and maintain considerable operational control <br /> over the donated rights pursuant to the terms of the donation agreement. <br /> Imposition of by-pass flows has caused all involved in the controversy to lose <br /> sight of the goal of protecting Colorado's precious public lands. Just as the land <br /> acquisition program of the LWCF has been successful in preserving a public land <br /> legacy, the free market approach of the LWCF can also be successful in providing the <br /> water for these public lands. <br /> I will work to structure donation agreements between CWCB and the federal <br /> government so water rights acquired can provide the long term protection we all <br /> desire. I urge Congress to adopt the CARA Fund legislation and to fund LWCF to its <br /> full 900 million dollar limit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.