Laserfiche WebLink
4rphan Welis c�i' Wiggins LLC: -- (IlC Forgiveness <br />Juiy t, 201 I <br />Page 3 crf 4 <br />Ageoda Itcm 27 <br />• In. 2009 OWW sells assets paici far with CWCB loan funds, but not sec,ur.ed by [he loan <br />contract, to cover the $140,Q0� in �ngineerin�; and le�;al fees. <br />• From 2009 to present CWCH and OWW hav� been workin�; tog�ther to develop a solutian <br />to address OWW's situation and outstanding debt. <br />Discussion <br />The past eight years for OWW has been a time consuming, expensive, and an emotionai endeavor, <br />with Iess than desirable results, �s articulated in Mr. �iruntz's attaclied Ietter. CWCB in 20Q3 <br />assumed the risk of providing loan funds to construct an. augmentation project without first having <br />aat approved water court augmenta.tion plan. It is di.fficult, however, ta forecast an.y water court <br />outcome and in most cases fundin.g is needed in advance to finance nec;cssary campon.ents of the <br />borrawer's overall application process. <br />Far the past 2 years OWW l�as actively tried to sell its au�nentation project in an effort to pay of#' <br />its debt wvith CWCB. It appears that negotiatians with pc�tential buyers are corraplicated by OWW's <br />contractual arrangement with CVVCB and the potential for 4WVil not being able to meet its <br />obligation. I3uyers are waiting to see if QWW defaulis, allowing CWCB to assume ownership and <br />sell the asset at a reduced aa�aounc. Yt has nat been staf�'s position tc� niove in the direction of <br />default, but ta work with UVVW irt developing a long term soluiion tJ7at works in the best interest of <br />bath parties. <br />It is OWW's current pasition to adhere to the terms of its loan contract with CWCB, make their <br />required an.nual payment of $SO,Q74.65, and to re-evaluate its positian under a revised set c�f <br />cot�ditions a��d parameters in the future. It's OWW's opinion that rts ability to obtain an approved <br />augmentation plan will improve, �ased on the lag time that ha.s occurred si�ice its wel.ls have been <br />turn.ed af..f.. <br />CWCB's collatera! positi.on on the original loan consists onty �f reeorded easements necessaxy tc� <br />complete xhe work (i.e. pipeIine, recharge pon.ds, weIls, etc.). 'T'herefore, it is staf�'opinion that it is <br />in the best interest af CWCB to work with OWW, given our current collateral position and the <br />curreni economic en��i:ronmen.t. I:n. forgivi.ng �Sb,872.44 in II)C, CWCF� wi.11 receive 10 shares of <br />Riverside i'rivate Reservoir Rights and 1 share �!' Jackson Private R�;sei�vair Ri�hts as additionai <br />collaterai, val.ued at $�80,000 ($42kishare Riverside and $60KJshare Jaekson). This all�ws CWCI3 <br />tc� svbstantial�y strengtheta its calla#er.al position, while OWVV commits to pay $95,739.28 in IDC <br />and make its annua) payment of $50,074.65. I:� OW W cioes not meet its amealded eontxactual <br />obligatian, CWC`B is i�i a rnuch t�etter �osition ta recc�up its investm.ent in the Project. <br />Staf�'views the request by OWW to reduee iI)C; as an isc�lated, unique case, subject to the review <br />and approval c�f'the I3oard, which cioes not grant any existi.�i� or future bozxower this co�asiderati.on. <br />