Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Gene J�ncsok <br />Mr. Dan Merrirn�-�n <br />Page 2 <br />appropri.ation. Brai:ton's information certainly is no <br />b�tl-.er than M�. rmrnons. i-i�'s just playing �rithm��.ic <br />wi th the nu�rib� rs on �he var ious S late R.iv�r s e��rnent s. <br />4-80CW094__ Washinc�ton�Gulch - Bratt<�n requests that we move the <br />~ lower �terminus up �o the headgate of the Schneider <br />No. 2 Ditclz, which is 2.5 m.iles upstream o� th� <br />Wi]_son 1)i�ch he�ic�g�i�.c wG ������o;��d a� �Iie l.owGr <br />�rid�oi.nl-.. '1'tle Wi:Laori is La.r senicar Lo l•.hc Scllneicl�r <br />No. 2 and would guarantee wa�.�r in the s�ream :Eor tar <br />longer �han th� lat�.�r. I recomm�nd we stay with thc� <br />Wilson Ditch h�adgal-.� as the lower terminus. <br />4-80CW103 - Cement Creek - Brattan recommends lowering our flow <br />r~to some unspeci��ied �zmount. We have filed for 10 <br />cEs. Last year, Water Commi�sioner Bob Drexel did <br />not feel our amount was unreasonable. I see no <br />r�ason to lower the appropriation. <br />4-80CW108 _ Mil� Creek - Bra�ton asks that we rr�ve the lower <br />rterminus up to near the USFS boundary, to a diversion <br />Eor i:he Judy iV�or�.h Elighline Ditch. The legal � <br />description in �he State Engineers' tabulation for � <br />that ditcr i.s apparent.ly incorrect. If we just move <br />up to the USPS boundary, �hat point would be <br />approximately one mile abov� the of the David <br />I-iighl.ine Di�ch which we proposed as the lower <br />te.rminus. I woula agre� to such a minor mov� <br />upstrea►n if it m�ans settling the case. <br />4-80CW109__ Carbon Creek - Bratton has agre�d to accept our <br />~ orignal applica�ion <br />4-80CW112_� Ohio Cre�k - We agreed to segm�nt this filing, but <br />r have not yet com�al.eted i:he Ei�ld work. Hopefully, <br />that can be done this y�ar. <br />4-80CW119 - Lake Fork Gunnison River (Henson Creek �o Blue M�sa <br />� Rese.rvoir)�- Bratton asks that we consider a 1<�w�r <br />amount. We have fil�d for S45, W25. There is a gag� <br />loca�ed inidway down +�h� segment (Lake Fork at <br />Gateview), and it shows that the appropriated flows <br />are very r���sonable. Based on that information, I <br />would recommend thai: we no� change �he flows claimed <br />in ou� original application. <br />M�MORANDUM -2- 6�7/83 <br />