My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1-02CW373 Supplemental Data
CWCB
>
Instream Flow Appropriations
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
1-02CW373 Supplemental Data
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2017 2:00:34 PM
Creation date
9/13/2011 3:35:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Instream Flow Appropriations
Case Number
02CW0373
Stream Name
South Fork South Platte River
Watershed
South Platte
Water Division
1
Water District
23
County
Park
Instream Flow App - Doc Type
Supplemental Data
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Table 1. Flow parameters used to determine minimum flow requirements using the <br />R2CROSS Method (after Nehring 1979). <br />Stream width Average depth <br />(feet) (feet) <br />Average velocity <br />(ft /sec) <br />Wetted perimeter <br />( %) <br />1 - 20 0.2 or greater 1 50 <br />21 -40 0.2 -0.4 1 50 <br />41 -60 0.4 -0.6 1 50 to 60 <br />61 - 100 0.6 — 1.0 1 70 or greater <br />Water Availability <br />The preferred technique to determine water availability is the analysis of observed data from a <br />continuously operated gaging station upstream of any water development on a stream. This <br />quality of data often does not exist for many streams. Discharge can be estimated using other <br />techniques such as statistical analysis. Multiple regression analysis of watershed variables is a <br />common technique for determining water availability (Gordon et al. 1992). Kircher et al. (1985) <br />developed relationships between mean monthly flow and drainage area and mean basin elevation <br />for the mountainous region of Colorado. Due to unique physiography and geology, these <br />relationships are not considered reliable for the South Park area. Therefore, standard regression <br />analysis of the available gage data was used to determine water availability. <br />Hydrology for the South Fork of the South Platte River was provided from the City of Aurora <br />gage. The data generally included discharge values from 1 April through 30 September for 1989 <br />through 2000. A statistical curve fitting approach on the 12 years of data was used to estimate <br />water availability from 1 October through 31 March. Average daily discharge was calculated <br />from the data and the spring and fall baseflow periods were isolated from the data and transposed <br />so that discharge could be estimated throughout the winter. The periods selected are shown in <br />Figure 4. Regressions were run using a standard statistical software package. The type of <br />regression that best fit the available data was a polynomial function (Figure 5). The resulting <br />regression equation that describes the best fit line through the data is: <br />y = 0.0007x2 — 0.2098x + 23.897 <br />Where y is the discharge (cfs) and x is the number of the day based on 7 September being day 1, <br />25 December being day 110, and 20 April being day 226. This modified day should only be <br />used with the above regression equation to estimate daily discharge from 1 October through 31 <br />March, which is the period with little or no available flow data. <br />Minimum Flow Study, South Fork of the South Platte River — Final Report Page 7 <br />February 19, 2001 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.