My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4-06CW231 Coal Creek Supplemental Data
CWCB
>
Instream Flow Appropriations
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
4-06CW231 Coal Creek Supplemental Data
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2016 11:29:09 PM
Creation date
9/1/2011 3:46:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Instream Flow Appropriations
Case Number
06CW0231
Stream Name
Coal Creek
Watershed
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Water District
40
County
Gunnison
Instream Flow App - Doc Type
Supplemental Data
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Land Status Review <br />Upper Terminus <br />Lower Terminus <br />Total Length <br />(miles) <br />Land Ownership <br />% Private <br />% Public <br />Little Gunnison <br />Creek <br />Anthracite Creek <br />4.8 <br />4% <br />96% <br />96% of the reach is located on public lands managed by the USFS and the other 4% of the reach <br />is located on private lands. <br />Biological and Field Survey Data <br />The CDOW has conducted field surveys of the fishery resources on this stream and have found a <br />natural environment that can be preserved. As reported in the letter from CDOW to the CWCB <br />"Coal Creek is classified as a river (between 60 to 99 feet wide) and fishery surveys indicate the <br />stream environment of Coal Creek supports a self - sustaining brown and rainbow trout fishery. <br />Coal Creek also supports populations of mottled sculpins, dace and blue head suckers" (See <br />CDOW Fish Survey in Appendix B). <br />Field Survey Data <br />CDOW staff used the R2CROSS methodology to quantify the amount of water required to <br />preserve the natural environment to a reasonable degree. The R2CROSS method requires that <br />stream discharge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle stream habitat type. Riffles are <br />most easily visualized, as the stream habitat types that would dry up first should streamflow <br />cease. This type of hydraulic data collection consists of setting up a transect, surveying the <br />stream channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge. Appendix B contains copies of <br />field data collected for this proposed segment. <br />Biological Flow Recommendation <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2CROSS data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream flow <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regard to water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity are used to develop <br />biologic instream flow recommendations. The CDOW has determined that maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996). <br />For this segment of stream, one data set was collected with the results shown in Table 1 below. <br />Table 1 shows who collected the data (Party), the date the data was collected (Date), the <br />measured discharge at the time of the survey (Q), the accuracy range of the predicted flows <br />based on Manning's Equation (240% and 40% of Q), the summer flow recommendation based <br />on meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 <br />hydraulic criteria. <br />Table 1: Data <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.