My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Colorado - Upper CO River Endangered Fish Recovery Program_Statement of Work
CWCB
>
WSRF Grant & Loan Information
>
DayForward
>
ARK - GUNNISON
>
Colorado - Upper CO River Endangered Fish Recovery Program_Statement of Work
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2012 1:40:27 PM
Creation date
8/9/2011 3:08:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
WSRA Grant and Loan Information
Basin Roundtable
Colorado
Applicant
Colorado River Water Conservation District
Description
Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program - Alternative Analysis
Account Source
Statewide
Board Meeting Date
3/13/2007
Contract/PO #
150404
WSRA - Doc Type
Supporting Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
13. Some reservoirs may require some level of permanent pool for recreational, environmental, <br />or aesthetic purposes. Discussions with the participant's Work Group will be required to <br />address this issue. <br />4.8 Initial Selection of Phase 2 Alternatives <br />The structural and non-structural elements will be configured into initial Phase 2 alternatives. An <br />environmental review of these initial alternatives will be subsequently completed. <br />It is anticipated that three types of alternatives will be developed; stand alone, multi-purpose, and mix <br />and match alternatives. The Study Team will provide a specific list of recommended alternatives, and <br />the actual alternatives that are evaluated will be selected by the project Steering Committee members. <br />Identification of stand alone and multi-purpose alternatives will be relatively straight forward. <br />However, numerous mix and match alternatives are possible. Grand River will initially recommend the <br />evaluation of a reasonable number of alternatives that represent the range of potential mix and match <br />scenarios that appear to be possible. It is anticipated that these alternatives will be subsequently <br />modified to some extent in the final portions of the Phase 2 study. <br />4.9 Environmental Evaluations <br />The potential environmental affects of each alternative will be investigated. Key areas of environmental <br />study will include stream flow, fisheries and recreation, water quality and general environmental. We <br />propose to assess three scenarios; a no action scenario, a status quo scenario, and a 10825 scenario. We <br />anticipate that definition of the no action and status quo scenario could require considerable steering <br />committee input. The implications of the no action scenario will be described in the text and not <br />assessed in an analytical manner. <br />The 10825 assessment will utilize recent environmental studies to the extent possible. For example, <br />numerous environmental and economic investigations related to Ruedi Reservoir and the Fryingpan <br />River has been completed through work of the Roaring Fork Conservancy. We will coordinate with the <br />Roaring Fork Conservancy throughout the study process. <br />Also, a Roaring Fork Watershed Plan is under development by the Conservancy, through a contract with <br />the Ruedi Water and Power Authority. We will utilize technical information developed in the plan to <br />the extent possible. Several of the stakeholders participating in the Roaring Fork Watershed Plan are <br />also involved in the 10825 alternatives study. These common stakeholders will facilitate coordination <br />between the two planning efforts. <br />10825 Phase 2 Scope of Work Revised May 25, 2007 per CWCB request Page 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.