ROD WM Permit 2011-02 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

have complied with statutory requirements and work extensively to collect data and worked with CSU Colorado Climate Center and specifically with Nolan Doesken. 21. Public hearing statements from Amy Kunugi of Southern Colorado Farms provided a five year summary and total precipitation collection for the 93 days permitting period for the last five years. Sometimes it works and sometimes we get rain and not hail. The difference is when hail storms are formed we have no effect and sometimes. We seem to have some effect where we have very soft slush balls or rain instead of hail. When spinach and lettuce is full of holes we can't sell it. People accused me that we weren't being truthful about the data so every time there was an event to send the data in real time via email to Nolan Doesken and Joe. We had two wet years 2006 and 2007 and ran the cannons more when more storms were coming through. We ran them for four times in 2009 and one time in 2010 for a total of about 40 minutes each year for both years. We only run the cannons once the storm is over our property. About 1/3 of the days we have some form of precipitation and we go collect the data. For the five year period there was an average of 30.4 days with rain on the ranch, 11.4 days with cannon usage, and 7.4 days with hail on the ranch. The amount of days we use the cannons and the amount of days we have hail are pretty close. We have complied with what the state asked us to do. So for five years we have been setting out hail pads and many rain gauges and monitoring them and collect the data and share it with everybody. 22. Public hearing statements from Joe Busto of the CWCB. We had a contentious hearing and a couple of follow up meetings and it would be helpful to collect usage data and ensure that operations are judicious. We all recognize that large losses in lettuce and spinach would be very expensive but you should be sure when it will hail on the farm. In Wyoming research project they needed 400 test cases to have statistical significance of 90% sure of their results. It takes a long time to tease out natural variability. Even though it's a labor intensive effort we appreciate good data collection. We asked you to do these things five years ago and you have been doing them. 23. Public hearing statements from Rick Randall and the data is all fine and it is not collecting data on my ranch and we don't get any rain. We don't get any rain anymore. We get less than one inch of moisture in one year. 24. Public hearing statement from Virginia Sutherland our observations do not necessarily coincide with the hail cannons. She lives on County Road T. What we are seeing is the clouds being broken over the San Juans or the La Garitas before they get to the Valley. Clouds used to come straight out over the Valley it seems it has been several years since that occurred. We have noticed airplanes flying into the clouds. We watch the storms go north east and south east not straight east. We went to the Pagosa Springs hearing and commented that winter seeding is making all the storms snow out on the other side of the mountain. Right now we are in a serious drought. Too many airplanes are flying into clouds. The cattle business is going to die here too. 25. Public hearing statements from Thad Eglert critical of all the monitoring of weather modification systems. Most monitoring is the west side of the divide where procedures take place. The CWCB wrote a regional SNOTEL site analysis to track to the snow data downwind of winter cloud seeding programs. That was written into the permit and he needs to develop a report on that. Thad recommends more monitoring. He thinks they did a good job of monitoring on the farm. We need ten years of measurements before we can get a significant handle on what is happening. 5