5-76W2720 Crystal River - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

WI I i 3 P � is i;. i. I� 1: 576 Colo. 594 PACIFIC REPORTER, 2d SERIES ity." Swisher v. Brown, 157 Colo. 378, 402 P.2d 621 (1965). The legislature must make the law even though "it may delegate the power to determine some fact or state of things to effectuate the purpose of the law." People v. Giordano, 173 Colo. 567, 481 P.2d 415 (1971). The Districts rely upon the fact that the General Assembly did not define the phrase "natural environment ", nor specify what it meant by requiring "such minimum flows . . . as are required to preserve the natural as to a reasonable de- gree." (Emphasis added) The Districts ar- gue that such definition and specification are insufficient here since the terms do not have any commonly accepted meaning. In this respect, they contend that the instant delegation differs from those approved in Giordano, supra, and Swisher, supra, where the legislative directives could be interpret- ed in light of objective scientific and eco- nomic standards .8 While we agree that the standards set forth call for evaluations by biologists rath- er than assessments regarding public health or economics, we cannot agree that the standards are not such as could be imple- mented by agencies having specific exper- tise regarding the preservation of flora, fauna and other aspects of the natural envi- ronment. Nor do we believe that the term "natural environment," anymore than simi- lar terms commonly coined such as "natural resources," is so vague that it does not indicate the task which the General Assem- bly intended the Colorado Water Board to accomplish. what life forms are presently flourishing or capable of flourishing should be delegated to an administrative agency which may avail itself of expert scientific opinion. This is particularly true, considering that the General Assembly undoubtedly antici- pated that the considerations for each locale might vary. Indeed, the Districts assert this as to the environs of the three stream segments here in question. Moreover, combining the legislative di- rective to preserve the natural environment with the power to appropriate minimum stream flows narrows the delegation so that it involves only that part of the natural environment where survival is affected by stream flow and lakes. The Districts argue that one indication that the term "natural environment" is vague is that the Colorado Water Board is considering preservation of five nonindige- nous fish species which are now in the stream segments: Colorado River Whitefish and Cutthroat, Rainbow, Eastern Brook and Brown Trout. They claim that these spe- cies should not be considered "natural." The parties' stipulation of facts states that related species of fish have existed in the streams in question in recent years, but have been destroyed due to natural or man - related causes. All of the existing species are naturally reproducing in the stream sys- tems, except some stocking is necessary for the Rainbow. We think that the Districts' interpreta- tion of "natural" is strained. The General Assembly clearly intended to have the Colo- rado Water Board preserve various life forms. To consider the introduction of de- sirable life forms as improper substitutes for former fish species that no longer exist, would inhibit accomplishment of the legisla- tive goal. In addition to the contention that the term "natural environment" is vague, the Districts object to the General Assembly's failure to define what it meant by the To require an enumeration of the forms of plant and animal life, as well as natural formations, which the legislature wished to preserve would be to impose an impossible task. The legislative objective is to pre- serve reasonable portions of the natural en- vironment in Colorado. Factual determina- tions regarding such questions as which ar- eas are most amenable to preservation and i 8. Giordano, supra, concerned sanitary regula- 1939 which employed such terms as "orderly tions promulgated by the Colorado Department marketing ", "uniform grading" and "economic of Health; and Swisher, supra, was interpret- waste." ing the Colorado Agricultural Marketing Act of � 3 f `: