My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Dealing With Drought Workshops Synthesis Notes
CWCB
>
Grants
>
DayForward
>
Dealing With Drought Workshops Synthesis Notes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2014 2:16:59 PM
Creation date
3/29/2011 9:23:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Grants
Applicant
University of Colorado - Western Water Assessment
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Fiscal Year (i.e. 2008)
2010
Project Name
Dealing With Drought Workshops
CWCB Section
Water Conservation & Drought Planning
Related Templates
Drought Mitigation
Grants - Doc Type
Supporting Documentation
Document Relationships
Dealing With Drought Workshop Final Report
(Message)
Path:
\Drought Mitigation\DayForward
Dealing With Drought Workshops SOW
(Message)
Path:
\Grants\DayForward
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
➢ More awareness of the need for better data and monitoring (e.g. how water is being <br />used <br />Christina Alvord & Taryn Hutchins - Cabibi's Group <br />Impacts from the 2002 Drought <br />➢ Trans - mountain diversions no longer viable <br />➢ Shallow - alluvial wells impacts: recharge rates into wells slower <br />➢ Regionalization of approach to drought management <br />➢ Disconnect between public willingness /awareness and severity of conditions <br />➢ 2002 was something tangible to relate to: brings saliency to the issue of early warning <br />drought monitoring <br />Key information needs as a result of the 2000's drought: <br />➢ 1177 and IBCC process a successful outcome: increased collaboration <br />➢ Conservation may be a sleeping giant -need to better understand the role of <br />conservation in drought conditions and growth <br />➢ Better understanding between conservation and demand hardening <br />➢ Increased storage: need storage to sustain through drought conditions <br />➢ West slope cannot dictate conservation <br />➢ Seasonal climate information limited: need 3 and 6 -month seasonal forecasting <br />➢ Early warning system: possible snowpack /water supply scenarios would have helped in <br />March 2002 <br />➢ Need to streamline drought trigger /water restrictions process: currently a 6 week <br />process; don't want to cry wolf, but conditions can change a lot over a six week period <br />➢ Need to utilize tools for monitoring <br />➢ Regionalization of planning <br />➢ Early warning: 6 -month seasonal forecasting with range of possible water supply <br />scenarios <br />Nolan Doesken's Group <br />Debrah: <br />➢ Design /Landscaping industry: landscape installation in the Denver area had to shut <br />➢ Some cities were still requiring Kentucky bluegrass despite dry conditions <br />➢ Profound personal effect: affected current /future profits <br />Eric: Water Managers Perspective <br />➢ Previous droughts (1977, 1981) had better early warning <br />➢ 2002: Winter season snowpack was ok <br />➢ 2002 snuck up on water managers because ski conditions /snowpack were okay <br />➢ Poor reaction time from water managers <br />➢ 2002: Very dry March that depleted snowpacks <br />➢ Snowpack behavior has seemed to change: snowpacks deplete much faster <br />➢ 2002 really exacerbated the "haves" and the "have nots" <br />➢ New growth areas had increased impact unless augmented by groundwater supplies <br />➢ Post Impact due to fire: silt in system <br />Scott Ludwig: USFS? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.