My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Dealing With Drought Workshops Synthesis Notes
CWCB
>
Grants
>
DayForward
>
Dealing With Drought Workshops Synthesis Notes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2014 2:16:59 PM
Creation date
3/29/2011 9:23:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Grants
Applicant
University of Colorado - Western Water Assessment
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Fiscal Year (i.e. 2008)
2010
Project Name
Dealing With Drought Workshops
CWCB Section
Water Conservation & Drought Planning
Related Templates
Drought Mitigation
Grants - Doc Type
Supporting Documentation
Document Relationships
Dealing With Drought Workshop Final Report
(Message)
Path:
\Drought Mitigation\DayForward
Dealing With Drought Workshops SOW
(Message)
Path:
\Grants\DayForward
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Climate Roadshow Notebooks <br />Breakout #1 <br />What information, planning strategies, etc. helped, or would have helped, you to better deal <br />with the impacts of the 2000s drought? <br />Castle Rock, CO <br />Jeff Lukas' Group <br />Impacts of 2002 drought <br />Curt <br />➢ Alluvial wells- rapidly declining levels <br />➢ Augmentation from senior rights -not senior enough <br />➢ Users slow to respond - perception of bad planning <br />Janet <br />➢ What worked in 2002? <br />• Turkey Creek Basin study (1998) - totally within Jefferson County <br />• Fractional granite backups on wells <br />• Districts implemented conservation procedures <br />• 2002 ET: 98% -126% <br />• No recharge <br />• Intermittent streams: no flow at elevations above 6400 ft <br />• Fish kill increased as temperatures role <br />• Water haulers stopped hauling <br />Paul <br />➢ Realized the inadequacy of the historic record <br />➢ "Bomb proof:" senior water rights commonly regarded as prior to 2002 <br />➢ Planning based on unpredictability of conditions <br />Brian <br />➢ Down to 23% reservoir capacity <br />➢ Started doing Prairie Waters Project: problematic <br />Julio <br />➢ 2002 was a major "wake up call" <br />What would have helped? <br />Curt <br />➢ Board of Directors needed information <br />➢ Regional cooperation <br />➢ Information sharing <br />➢ Janet <br />➢ One commission from UT had insight <br />➢ Conservation plans <br />Paul <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.