My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Dealing With Drought Workshops Synthesis Notes
CWCB
>
Grants
>
DayForward
>
Dealing With Drought Workshops Synthesis Notes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2014 2:16:59 PM
Creation date
3/29/2011 9:23:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Grants
Applicant
University of Colorado - Western Water Assessment
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Fiscal Year (i.e. 2008)
2010
Project Name
Dealing With Drought Workshops
CWCB Section
Water Conservation & Drought Planning
Related Templates
Drought Mitigation
Grants - Doc Type
Supporting Documentation
Document Relationships
Dealing With Drought Workshop Final Report
(Message)
Path:
\Drought Mitigation\DayForward
Dealing With Drought Workshops SOW
(Message)
Path:
\Grants\DayForward
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Katy Holgate (S. Ute Tribal Water) <br />2002 relate history <br />Animas R. "nutrient workgroup' <br />Algal bloom from low flow, [high] temperature, wastewater treatment <br />"Nutrients became a big issue in 2002!" <br />[led to ] monitoring <br />After the fire "fire study" [documented] impacts Animas compared to the San Juan and Dolores <br />reference. [ Dolores and San Juan not impacted by this fire so they were used as reference for <br />impacts on the Animas] <br />Animas R. rebounded quickest because of natural flows. <br />Pine R. has not rebounded [because] 'controlled'. No instream flow protection. <br />[Page 19] <br />Planning [ what would do differently; planning for drought; information needed] <br />Predict snowpack (with confidence limits) -- could modify fertilizer use, etc or fallow fileds <br />Need prediction in February or March <br />.. or earler because need to buy fertilizer in Fall. <br />Daily Flows management problem (La Plata) <br />EPA focus on nutrient standards <br />Efficiency in delivery of water [ example: Pine R. Valley; it was expressed that the management <br />in that valley was inefficient in that water was not getting to where it was needed even for <br />those with rights.] <br />Delivery of water <br />Cleaning ditches <br />Return flows — may be re -used water [ implications for nutrient levels] <br />Felicity: strengthen systems that hold water [ when mentioned natural and man -made <br />systems]; <br />Municipal /water [ discussion of Ag/ municipal water transfers] <br />Don't forget groundwater —build up aquifers. But some aquifers are recharged by irrigation — <br />example: Florida Mesa. <br />Population Land use/ Growth [ a discussion of people moving in or out of the region facing <br />growth as a driver of water use] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.