My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Dealing With Drought Workshops Synthesis Notes
CWCB
>
Grants
>
DayForward
>
Dealing With Drought Workshops Synthesis Notes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2014 2:16:59 PM
Creation date
3/29/2011 9:23:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Grants
Applicant
University of Colorado - Western Water Assessment
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Fiscal Year (i.e. 2008)
2010
Project Name
Dealing With Drought Workshops
CWCB Section
Water Conservation & Drought Planning
Related Templates
Drought Mitigation
Grants - Doc Type
Supporting Documentation
Document Relationships
Dealing With Drought Workshop Final Report
(Message)
Path:
\Drought Mitigation\DayForward
Dealing With Drought Workshops SOW
(Message)
Path:
\Grants\DayForward
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Joe Barsugli's Group <br />A Importance of communication and education at all levels <br />➢ Understanding how water systems work among the populace <br />➢ Keeping the memory of drought alive! <br />➢ Landscaping and demand hardening; where does this go next time? <br />➢ Demand for more storage; general conflict between the desire for better <br />supplies yet also desire for more non - consumptive needs and environmental <br />protections <br />➢ Better predictions and observations <br />➢ Streamline bureaucracy at state engineer and federal level so can quickly <br />respond - streamline all levels of governance <br />Chad McNutt's Group <br />➢ Better coordination among water providers <br />➢ When is it a drought? Not a drought until it's gone <br />➢ Identifying triggers <br />➢ Characterization of customers and demand patterns and behavior <br />➢ Consistent messaging across water provider lines and districts <br />➢ Lack of ability to share water <br />➢ Better forecasting for agriculture; planting influence, etc. <br />➢ Water rates and value of water; drought has changed rates and structures; value <br />of conservation <br />Group Wrap -Up /Additions <br />➢ Perception of vulnerability between urban and suburban water users <br />➢ Education and planning to buffer mismatch; never going to be 100% for extreme <br />events <br />➢ Mountain counties /granite rock: need well monitoring as indicators of drought <br />and impacts on streamflow <br />➢ Water providers view drought as a failure in planning —not necessarily true <br />➢ Drought as a catalyst for longer term changes; need flexibility /adaptability in the <br />plans <br />➢ Did 2002 last long enough? How would thing be different now if it had? <br />➢ Landscape water restrictions were the buffer (conservation); but what about <br />now that we are now using more efficient tools <br />Breakout Discussion #2: <br />What will be the most difficult (top 5) and important challenges climate change will <br />pose for Colorado in the future? <br />➢ Reduced yields to native flows and changes in trans -basin diversion for the Front <br />Range <br />➢ Increase consumptive use; decreased return flows <br />➢ Increased conflict and competition <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.