My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Dealing With Drought Workshops Synthesis Notes
CWCB
>
Grants
>
DayForward
>
Dealing With Drought Workshops Synthesis Notes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2014 2:16:59 PM
Creation date
3/29/2011 9:23:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Grants
Applicant
University of Colorado - Western Water Assessment
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Fiscal Year (i.e. 2008)
2010
Project Name
Dealing With Drought Workshops
CWCB Section
Water Conservation & Drought Planning
Related Templates
Drought Mitigation
Grants - Doc Type
Supporting Documentation
Document Relationships
Dealing With Drought Workshop Final Report
(Message)
Path:
\Drought Mitigation\DayForward
Dealing With Drought Workshops SOW
(Message)
Path:
\Grants\DayForward
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Dealing with Drought- Adapting to a Changing Climate <br />Durango, CO, October 22, 2009 <br />Group Synthesis <br />Breakout Discussion # 1 <br />What information, planning strategies, etc. helped, or would have helped, you to <br />better deal with the impacts of the 2000s drought? <br />Joe Barsugli's Group <br />Impacts <br />➢ Junior water rights: call on the Animas River, first call <br />➢ Need for augmentation plan <br />➢ Water Conflict by sector: Agriculture, Tribes, Instream <br />➢ Fire was a major issue: no waters to fight or mitigate the fire <br />➢ Spurred the need for fire management <br />➢ Animas, La -Plata River, New Mexico Compact: based on assumptions that 2002 <br />dismantled <br />➢ Water quality issues stemming from drought <br />Needs <br />➢ Better prediction of water supplies <br />➢ 6 or 12 month climate /water scenarios would be useful for agriculture sector <br />➢ Augmentation plans -need the development of storage to offset drought <br />➢ Shortage sharing in the future <br />➢ Long -term planning needed <br />➢ Planning for growth, anticipate growth as input into water supplies <br />Jeff Lukas' Group <br />Impacts <br />➢ A lot of cooperation amongst users during the drought <br />➢ 1996 was first call on Silverton <br />➢ Fire =poor water quality <br />➢ Awareness occurred amongst the general population concerning water <br />consumption, however it appears it didn't last long (2 years) <br />Needs <br />➢ Better interpretation of the climate information <br />➢ Better seasonal forecasting needed -need a better idea of what is going to <br />happen <br />➢ Basin -wide preparedness <br />➢ 2002 -pure crisis management: reactionary -need early warning <br />➢ Increased storage needed -could help with warming trend (differing opinions) <br />➢ Basin -wide cooperation -1177 IBCC was a good outcome of the drought <br />o IBCC gives an understanding of basin and cross -basin supplies <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.