My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
34
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
34
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2010 10:49:11 AM
Creation date
8/18/2010 3:34:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/21/2010
Description
Stream & Lake Protection Section - Case Nos. 6-07CW061 and 6-07CW072: Applications of Upper Yampa Water Conservancy District
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
Document Relationships
Agenda Change
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board Meetings\DayForward\1-1000
JulyAgenda (2)
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board Meetings\DayForward\1-1000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
B. Delivery from Morrison Creek Reservoir to Stagecoach Reservoir may be made <br />by pipeline and/or ditch across the Morrison Divide and further pipeline, ditch and/or use <br />of the stream channel of Little Morrison Creek and/or any tributary of Little Morrison <br />Creek. <br />11. Contemplated Draft of Rights to be Changed. <br />A. The Court received evidence concerning the contemplated draft of the water <br />rights to be changed, specifically the amount that would be available for diversion and <br />storage at the original dam site of the Pleasant Valley Reservoir and the headgate of the <br />Pleasant Valley Feeder Canal. The District's experts utilized available and reliable <br />stream flow records regarding the Yampa River and its tributaries and a study period of <br />1985 through the 2007 water year in order to simulate the available diversions for the <br />Pleasant Valley Reservoir and its Feeder Canal as if they were constructed at their <br />original points of diversion and storage. Appropriate adjustments were made in the data <br />to reflect the development of major diversion facilities, specifically including the <br />District's Stagecoach Reservoir. <br />B. The analysis revealed that, if operated pursuant to their originally decreed <br />priorities, the Pleasant Valley Project Rights could have diverted on average 42,607 acre- <br />feet per year of storage, assuming that all of the water stored in Pleasant Valley Reservoir <br />had been released prior to the end of each modeled storage year (March through <br />February). The analysis considered a demand of existing water rights on Walton Creek <br />totalling 289 cfs. During the most extreme dry periods, at least 34,200 acre feet of water <br />was available for storage. This amount of water is sufficient to account for the 23,354 <br />acre feet already made absolute in Yamcolo and Stagecoach Reservoirs and the additional <br />10,620 acre feet proposed for the Morrison Creek Reservoir. Accordingly, junior rights <br />located downstream from the original points of diversion and storage shall not be <br />required to by-pass any of the amount determined to be legally and physically available. <br />In addition, terms and conditions have been included at paragraph 12, below, to prevent <br />an enlargement of the draft on Morrison Creek or Walton Creek. <br />C. The Court has recognized in Case No. 0 1 CW4 1, District Court, Water Division 6, <br />that the Pleasant Valley Project Rights may be stored under the 2001 priority and used for <br />augmentation and exchange for replacement purposes and all other augmentation uses. <br />Consequently, the water stored under the Pleasant Valley Project Water Rights at the <br />Morrison Creek Reservoir under the 2001 priority may be fully consumed and issues of <br />contemplated diversion and return flows are not relevant in the Court's analysis of the <br />contemplated draft. <br />D. The evidence establishes that water was available in the amounts claimed at the <br />original points of diversion and place of storage, which points of diversion and places of <br />storage are moved upstream as decreed herein. <br />CASE NO. 07CW61 <br />FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, <br />AND JUDGMENT AND DECREE <br />PAGE 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.