Laserfiche WebLink
Linda Bassi, Esq <br />Page 6 <br />July 7, 2010 <br />5 The investigation found no potential threatened, endangered, or sensitive plant <br />species that could occur on this site. <br />6 IME determined that there were no specific fatal flaws relative to this site. <br />Threatened and Endangered Species. Under the Section 404 process, the Corps will <br />complete a NEPA review of the Project merits. As part of its review, the Corps is <br />required under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to protect threatened and <br />endangered species and their habitat. The effect of this Act is that the Corps, as part of <br />the NEPA process, will review the project to determine if the proposed action will affect <br />any species which are listed under the Endangered Species Act. Additionally, the Corps <br />must review a list maintained by the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) that includes <br />species of special concern, which are not legally protected but are considered when <br />assessing impacts. During the evaluation of threatened, endangered, and other species <br />of concern, the Corps will undergo forrnal consultation with the United States Fish and <br />Wildlife Service (USFWS) as required by Section 7 of the Act. <br />The USFWS has previously determined that existing water depletions are adversely <br />impacting four endangered fish species in the Yampa River basin. The four endangered <br />species include: Colorado Pike Minnow, Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, and <br />Bonytail Chub. Due to poor conditions that currenfly exist, the USFWS has determined <br />that depletions associated with future water development projects may jeopardize the <br />continued existence of the four fish species, <br />In 2005, the USFWS, in cooperation with the State of Colorado, prepared a <br />Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO) regarding the four endangered fish species in <br />the Yampa River The PBO sets forth specific recovery actions designed to aid in the <br />recovery of the four fish species while allowing water users in the Yampa River to <br />develop new depletions estimated to be up to 53,000 AF per year. Under the PBO, new <br />water projects involving depletions of more than 100 AF per year require signing of a <br />Recovery Agreement and payment of a one time fee to fund recovery efforts under the <br />USFWS's "Management Plan for Endangered Fishes in the Yampa River Basin and <br />Environmental Assessment. "3 By signing the Recovery Agreement, the water users <br />simply agree not to interfere with implementation of recovery actions under the <br />management plan. <br />The potential stream depletions associated with the Morrison Creek Reservoir fall under <br />the umbrella of the Programmatic Biological Opinion prepared by the USFWS. Because <br />the depletions will exceed 100 AF per year, the District %Will have to formally recognize <br />and sign the Recovery Agreement and pay a one-time fee to fund various recovery <br />actions. As of 2006, the required fee was $16.67 per acre foot. Thus, for example, if the <br />total stream depletions associated vWth the Project were estimated to be 1,000 AF, a <br />one-time payment of $16,670 would be required. The exact amount of Project <br />2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2005. Final Programmatic Biological Opinion on the <br />Management Plan for Endangered Fishes in the Yampa River Basin. USFWS Mountain-Prairie Region (6), <br />Lakewood, Colorado. <br />a Roehm, G.W., 2004. Management Plan for the Endangered Fishes in the Yampa River Basin and <br />Environmental Assessment. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mountaln-Praide Region (6), Lakewood, <br />Colorado, 214 pages. <br />R E S 0 U R C E <br />all E N G I " F r r A G I N C <br />