My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
StCharlesMesa_WCPlan_95%PR
CWCB
>
Water Efficiency Grants
>
Day Forward
>
StCharlesMesa_WCPlan_95%PR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2011 9:32:58 AM
Creation date
7/27/2010 5:42:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Efficiency Grants
Water Efficiency Grant Type
Water Conservation Planning Grant
Contract/PO #
OE PDA 08-141
Applicant
St. Charles Mesa Water District
Project Name
St. Charles Mesa Water District Water Conservation Plan
Title
95% Progress Report
Date
3/1/2010
County
Pueblo
Water Efficiency - Doc Type
Interim Reports
Document Relationships
StCharlesMesa WCPlan 2010
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\DayForward
StCharlesMesa_WCPlan_Invoice
(Message)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
River. This is the core area of the system, and the impact of additional taps does not justify increased Plant <br />Investment Fees, or the need for additional infrastructure, above and beyond the normal rate. The second tap <br />fee category is for user's who are located East of the St. Charles River. This area of the distribution system is <br />less densely populated, and will require more infrastructure improvement in order to support additional growth. <br />Percent Complete 100% <br />Step #6 — Evaluate and Select Conservation Measures and Programs <br />The District has identified several Demand Side and Supply Side Conservation Measures and Programs for <br />evaluation. YTG has prepared the Evaluation Worksheets (6 -1, 6 -2 and 6 -3) based on the Measures and Programs <br />identified in Step #5. The Customer Rebate Programs have been limited in size in order to determine the potential <br />impact on Water Revenue. Each Measure /Program has been evaluated for potential cost savings, water savings and <br />economic impact to the District. <br />It appears that the initial water savings will be accomplished through the District implemented, Supply Side Measures <br />of Meter Replacement and Leak Detection and Repair. This is due to the fact that this will decrease the cost of <br />supplying water to the users, by reducing the percentage of "Non- Revenue" water. Also, the District has control of <br />these projects, depending on funding availability, and can implement them in an organized manner. <br />It is not known how the Demand Side Measures will impact the District, as they are dependent upon user participation. <br />For that reason, initial implementation of these measures will be smaller, but more diverse. This should allow the <br />District to determine which programs are effective in promoting water conservation. <br />Percent Complete 100% <br />Step #7 — Integrate Resources and Modify Forecasts <br />Based upon the projected water savings from Step #6, the Modified Demand Forecast was calculated in Worksheet 7- <br />1. A 5 % -7% savings is projected, based on full implementation of all identified Measures and Programs. This <br />percentage should increase, as the various Measures and Programs are implemented, and the most successful are <br />identified and promoted. <br />Analysis of the Conservation Measures and Programs may allow postponement of projected Treatment Plant Capacity <br />upgrades. Specifically, if the Conservation Measures and Programs are successful, the District can postpone the <br />installation of a 2.0 MGD filter at the Main Treatment Plant. Depending upon the length of time of the postponement, <br />the savings to the District will range from $35,000 to $600,0000. The range is from 1 year to 10 years. This will allow <br />the District to concentrate its financial resources to other Conservation Measures and Programs, during this period. <br />Also, it appears that the reduced revenue from water sales can be offset by growth. The overall goal is to stay slightly <br />ahead of the loss of revenue from Conservation, by selling enough taps to equalize revenue loss. This is reflected in <br />Worksheet 7 -5. <br />Percent Complete 100% <br />Step #8 — Develop Implementation Schedule <br />The first Measure /Program to be implemented shall be the replacement of the old meters with new, radio read meters. <br />This will not only correct inaccurate metering, but will reduce the District's cost to read the meters. This process is on <br />going, in a very limited capacity. Currently, the District replaces approximately 200 meters annually. To date, they <br />have replaced approximately 400 of the over 4,000 meters. <br />The Meter replacement program shall be done in conjunction with the Leak Detection and Repair Program. <br />These two supply side measures shall be implemented first, as they will have the greatest direct benefit to the District. <br />The demand side measures shall be phased in, over time, beginning with small, pilot programs, in order to determine <br />which measures are succeeding. It is important for the District to be able to phase in the demand side measures, so <br />as to not have a negative impact on the Districts finances. Also, all Conservation Measures and Programs are <br />dependent on the availability of grant monies. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.