Laserfiche WebLink
30 -11 -101, et. seq, to represent the concerns of the County and its constituents <br />who lie upstream of the proposed Recreational In- Channel Diversion and may be <br />adversely impacted by the claim. <br />B. Applicant must demonstrate its compliance with the requirements of C.R.S. 37- <br />92 -102 (6) and 37 -92 305 (13). Applicant must demonstrate that its Application <br />is not speculative. <br />C. The application fails to set forth sufficient terms and conditions to prevent injury <br />to other water rights. <br />D. There may be other grounds for opposition which cannot be determined from the <br />information available at this time. Therefor, objector reserves the right to raise <br />additional grounds for opposition. This statement of opposition shall apply, <br />without refiling, to amendments to the application. <br />Respectfully submitted this <.`" day of April, 2006, <br />TROUT, RALEY, MOI TA NO, WITWER <br />& FREEMAN, P.C. <br />B -,/ �, f . ,� <br />� / <br />Peggy M niano, #11075 <br />Douglas M. Sinor, #31148 <br />ATTORNEYS FOR OBJECTOR <br />LA PLATA COUNTY <br />C: \VOCUmenis src. Settings \f'egay3ontano \Lgcal Set tinos\'1'Zo \Statement o' (h+nositi on .4rpd <br />