Laserfiche WebLink
SIE <br />The Animas River at its confluence with the San Juan has an average annual flow of <br />approximately 670,000 of which is about 33% of the entire flow of the San Juan. Of that amount <br />about 80,000 of comes from the Florida, which joins the Animas near the Stateline and below the <br />RICD. The Animas River therefore provides one, if not the largest, source of water for future <br />development in the San Juan Basin. How much of that actually gets developed in the future is <br />subject to supposition given the considerable energy resources in the basin. <br />The proposed RICD water right would, at least at certain times, cause more water to flow to <br />New Mexico than may otherwise be required under the Colorado River compacts. Thus, Colorado's <br />entitlement to water pursuant to the Colorado River compacts cannot be deemed fully developed merely <br />because there may be some times during some years where water users would be able to develop water <br />above and beyond what the RICD would pull down through this reach of the Animas River. Under the <br />pertinent inquiry, described above, the imposition of an RICD on the Animas River will cause the <br />Animas River to be over - appropriated. Water development upstream of the RICD will no longer be <br />able to occur unless the RICD water right is fully satisfied or the City chooses not to call for its RICD <br />water right. <br />The Gunnison decision provides that the Board should make findings on "whether beneficial <br />consumptive water use opportunities upstream from the claimed RICD would further develop <br />Colorado's compact entitlements and would be impaired by Applicant's sought for stream flow <br />amounts." (Emphasis added). Thus, if new uses of water or exchanges are likely through this reach, <br />Colorado's compact entitlements could be impaired by the RICD water right. This is a pertinent inquiry <br />pursuant to RICD Rule 7.a.v. If there are situations where the RICD would prevent new junior <br />upstream uses or exchanges from locations downstream of the RICD reach to locations upstream of the <br />RICD reach, whereby water users would be impaired from water use opportunities upstream of the <br />RICD, then this Board should find that Colorado's compact entitlements could be impaired. In the <br />present case, there are potential new uses and potential exchange opportunities that could occur from <br />locations downstream of the RICD reach to points located upstream of the RICD reach but for the <br />amounts claimed by the RICD. The Applicant's own analysis demonstrates this. For example, Table 1 <br />of the Wheeler report demonstrates that in the entire period of record examined, from 1928 until 2004, <br />there would have been a call on the Animas River for the RICD water right in every single year. There <br />is not a single year in that period of record where a call by the RICD could not have occurred. Thus, to <br />claim that the water right would not impair Colorado's ability to fully use its compact entitlements is <br />implausible. Similarly, it is illustrative to review the historical records in certain drier years, as <br />compared to the RICD flow rates. In comparing the RICD flow rates to the recorded flows in 2002, for <br />example, the RICD could have called out all uses upstream of the RICD for all but a few days in the <br />fall. One might say that 2002 was an anomaly. Certainly 2002 was an extraordinary dry year. But <br />comparing the RICD proposed flow rates from 2001 through 2003 demonstrates a similar pattern <br />whereby the RICD could have place a call for substantial periods of time. <br />Rule 7.a.ii of the RICD requires this Board to consider the proximity of the RICD to the State <br />line. To date, this Board has never had to consider an RICD as close to the state line as this one. Here, <br />the RICD is approximately 21 miles from the State line with only a couple of small diversions in <br />Colorado below the RICD that could utilize flows potentially protected by the RICD. While the <br />Animas La -Plata pump station ( "ALP ") is just below the RICD, the majority of lands below the RICD <br />are tribal lands. <br />Flood Protection • Water Project Planning and Finance • Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection • Conservation Planning <br />