Laserfiche WebLink
iv. Whet u reasonable and efficient means isto|e utilized \o use, divert capture <br />and cmkn| t water for oRfCD so as to minimize its call upon t river and <br />avoid waste; <br />V. Whether o reasonable demand exists for the recreational activity in question as <br />determined hylevels of current use and/or estimates o[ future on:� <br />vi. Whether the application has appropriate limitations upon the time of day, days per <br />onou(b or seasons duziu wbicbLbe R]CI) would be exercised; <br />vii. The depth and flow rate of the proposed DJCI]; <br />viii. With what frequency and duration, and from what sources, the requested amounts <br />of water for the RlCL}000ur� <br />ix. The economic effects of the proposed B]M, <br />X. The environmental effects of the proposed 0{CZ>� <br />xi. The relationshi uf the requested AJCZ} flow rates to the historic appropriated and <br />unappropriated flow rates for each time period requested; <br />xii. The effect ofthe [l}C[) on other potential uses ofwater; <br />xiii. Whether the application as uvvbole meets the elements of the definition of <br />fllCI),us found iu section 37-92-l03(iO.3); <br />ziY. Whether the FUCD would conserve and efficiently use the available stromoOovv, <br />thereby promoting maximum utilization of Colorado's water resources; <br />xv. Whether the RIM will make the river basin water critical and describe the <br />resulting impact on existing water rights and uoozo; <br />svi. Whether the RICD may work together with existing and/or future uses within the <br />State o[ Colorado tm promote maximum utilization: <br />xxii Any provision in the application for reducing or canceling the BUC[)| <br />uvili. A description of each recreational opportunity sought by the applicant at each <br />flow amount sought, and why the flow amount is the minimum amount for each <br />reasonable recreation experience sought. <br />xix. The historic frequency and flow rates of imported water and reservoir releases <br />through the proposed FUC[) reach ` and vvhuibcz such flows will bc necessary to <br />meet the flow rates claimed for the proposed RJC[>;and, <br />xr. Whether, and to what extent, unappropriated native flows exist in the proposed <br />Q3CI) stream reach during the periods claimed, and the percentage of <br />unappropriated flows o|uizood by the RICD. <br />[ Pursuant to section 37-9Z-]O2(6)/6)/l/D additional factor that in appropriate <br />for evaluation of RICD applications is whether the application meets the elements of the <br />definition o[uPUCDom found in section 37-92'l03(l0.3\. This requires the amount <br />claimed to be the "minimum abeoo/ Onvv" and that iibe fbru "reasonable recreation <br />experience." The board mbon\d consider whether the requested BJC[) physical control <br />structures divert, capture, onubn| and place to beneficial use the water claimed. <br />8. Additional Informat <br />Because section 37-92-102(6)(b) C.R.S. requires the board to report its findings within 90 Juvn <br />after the closi date for the OUno nfmta1cnneu1a o[opPouitiou. an applicant may elect to provide <br />additional iotbono1iou at the time it sobnoitx its application tothe boord. The fb||ovviog types of <br />information would assist the board inrnaking its findings and recommendation: <br />