Laserfiche WebLink
January 23 -24, 2007 Board Meeting <br />Agenda Item 17 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />Coordinated Operations of Powell and Mead under Low Reservoir <br />Conditions: Under the current Long -Range Operating Criteria for Colorado River <br />Reservoirs, Lake Powell and Lake Mead equalize storage whenever Powell storage is <br />greater than storage in Lake Mead so long as Powell is above the 602(a) storage level. <br />The 602(a) storage level is the volume of water deemed necessary in Lake Powell, <br />Flaming Gorge, Aspinall, and Navajo to assure to the extent possible that the Upper <br />Basin can sustain its current level of development without having to curtail uses so that <br />during a drought the Lower Basin receives the water apportioned to it. The current <br />602(a) storage requirement is elevation 3630 or approximately 14.85 MAF. When <br />Powell is below the 602(a) level, operations at Glen Canyon Dam seek to maintain a <br />minimum objective release of 8.23 MAF (7.5 MAF per year plus one -half of the 1.5 <br />MAF delivery obligation to Mexico, the latter condition to which the Upper Basin <br />strongly disagrees with). The result is that Lake Powell absorbs the impact of the drought <br />at the beginning and Lake Mead absorbs the drought impacts on the tail end until Powell <br />has recovered to the 602(a) storage level. Under the proposed adjustment to the criteria <br />when the reservoirs reach certain reduced levels of storage, they would be operated in a <br />manner that keeps the amount of storage in the two reservoirs approximately equal and <br />the Lower Basin would begin to take shortages. The range of release would be expanded <br />in order to provide the flexibility to achieve this objective, which is beneficial to the <br />Upper Basin. A diagram and brief description of the States proposal for the coordinated <br />• operations of Lakes Powell and Mead under low reservoir conditions is attached. <br />Improved System Efficiency and Management: The Lower Basin is evaluating <br />a number of system improvements and management strategies to improve the efficiency <br />of their operations. The Upper Basin has been adamant that these improvements remain <br />in the Lower Basin and that the Lower Basin does not seek these types of improvements <br />in the Upper Basin because the Upper Basin is relying on these types of improvements in <br />the future for its own benefit. <br />The Lower Basin towards this end is looking at canal linings, additional storage <br />such as that along the All- American Canal (Drop 2 reservoir), and "Intentionally Created <br />Surplus" or ICS accounts in Lake Mead. We would note that Lake Mead has previously <br />never had any storage accounts, rather Lower Basin water users have submitted water <br />orders to Reclamation and deliveries have been made to them in accord with the <br />Compacts and their contract terms. The Lower Basin is also developing groundwater <br />banks, mostly in Arizona, where a states unused apportionment can be banked and <br />recovered at a later date. A number of forbearance and other agreements are required to <br />achieve this objective, some of which are already in place. <br />Augmentation of Colorado River Supplies: The Southern Nevada Water <br />Authority, pursuant to the terms of the proposed 7 -State Agreement, is funding a <br />basinwide augmentation study that is looking at all potential augmentation sources. <br />Representatives from each of the 7- States are serving on an advisory committee for the <br />study effort (Rod Kuharich and Randy Seaholm are serving in that capacity for <br />Colorado). The study is focused on vegetative management, desalination of brackish <br />