My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
State/SPWRAP for Implementation of PRRIP Unresolved Issues
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
State/SPWRAP for Implementation of PRRIP Unresolved Issues
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2010 11:35:38 AM
Creation date
7/21/2010 2:06:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
South Platte River Recovery Implementation Program
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
2/6/2006
Author
SPWRAP, PRRIP
Title
State/SPWRAP for Implementation of PRRIP Unresolved Issues
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
into the program to pay assessments back to the beginning of <br />SPWRAP. <br />c. If Colorado's costs of participating in PRRIP will be shared by the State <br />and SPWRAP, will the State support mandatory membership in <br />SPWRAP? <br />Water users on tributaries of the North Platte in Colorado were not <br />expressly considered when SPWRAP was created. SPWRAP agrees <br />that those users should be covered, and that their monetary <br />contribution, if any, should be quite small. The rate of assessment and <br />means of collecting it have not been determined. <br />d. What standards for certification to FWS should be put in this agreement? <br />e. SPWRAP articles provided for possibility of a large new project whose <br />depletions it could not cover under the program. Though an unlikely <br />scenario, such a project would have to go through an individual § 7 <br />Analysis. Does the State see a need for such an "out "? If so, how should <br />it be reflected in this document? If not, does this affect the allocation of <br />responsibilities for paying the costs of water re- regulation activities? <br />6 Unres- Issues 2 -6 -06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.