Laserfiche WebLink
9 • <br />COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />215 State Services Building <br />1525 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />February 15, 1965 <br />M E M O R A N D U M <br />TO: Felix L. Sparks, Director. <br />FROM: Laren D. Morrill, Senior Plater Resource Engineer. <br />SUBJECT: Proposed West Paradox Project. <br />On November 9, 1964, a meeting was held in Paradox, <br />Colorado, to ascertain the status of the proposed West Paradox <br />Project. At that meeting, which was attended by the interested <br />water users of Paradox Valley along with staff members of the <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board and the Soil Conservation <br />Service, it was decided that the next step necessary was a <br />latter of intent from the water users stating that they wished <br />to proceed. Mr. G. E. McCrimmon, Assistant State Conservationist <br />for the Soil Conservation Service, had previously stated at this <br />meeting that the Soil Conservation Service had gone as far as <br />possible in the prelLieinary phases of this project without <br />assurance that the people: would organize legally and that they <br />could finance the project. <br />On January 18, 1965, Mr. Otho Ayers, President of <br />the Paradox Valley Canal and Reservoir Company wrote me a <br />letter, a copy of which is attached, indicating that at their <br />annual meeting which was held on January 12, 1965, the stock- <br />holders agreed that the work on the proposed project should <br />proceed as rapidly as possible. They also expressed a willing- <br />ness to take the necessary legal steps to enable them to contract <br />with the United States. <br />Since the primary feature of the proposed project is <br />enlarging the Buckeye Reservoir owned by the Paradox Valley <br />Canal and Reservoir Company, and since all the irrigators in- <br />terested in this proposed project are stockholders in the <br />Paradox Valley Canal and Reservoir Company, it is my opinion <br />that the attached letter from ter. Ayers is sufficient to serve <br />as the required letter of intent. in addition, Mr. Ayers has <br />