My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Curecanti National Recreation Area: Personal Watercraft Use Enviornmental Assessment
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
Curecanti National Recreation Area: Personal Watercraft Use Enviornmental Assessment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2010 12:48:59 PM
Creation date
7/16/2010 1:41:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Colorado River Water Projects: Aspinall Storage Unit, Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
4/1/2003
Author
National Park Service
Title
Curecanti National Recreation Area: Personal Watercraft Use Enviornmental Assessment
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION <br />The majority of personal watercraft used today are powered by conventional two- stroke engines (NPS <br />1998, California Air Resources Board [CARB] 1999). Multiple studies have demonstrated that four - <br />stroke engines are substantially cleaner than carbureted, two- stroke engines, generating approximately <br />90% fewer emissions (Warrington 1999; Oregon Department of Environmental Quality [ODEQ] 1999; <br />TRPA 1999). PWIA notes that direct - injection engines have been available in personal watercraft for four <br />years; and three PWC manufacturers introduced four - stroke engines for the 2002 model year (PWIA <br />2002a). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) assumes that the existing two- stroke engine <br />models would not be completely replaced by newer PWC technology until 2050 (40 CFR 89, 90, 91). <br />The average operating life of a personal watercraft is 5 to 10 years, depending upon the source. The <br />formula for determining the operating life of personal watercraft was published in the Federal Register on <br />October 4, 1996 (EPA 1996a). Based on this formula, the National Park Service expects that by 2012, <br />most boat owners will already be in compliance with the 2006 EPA marine engine standards. The <br />Personal Watercraft Industry Association believes the typical operating life of a personal watercraft rental <br />is three years and approximately five to seven years for a privately owned vessel (PWIA 2002a). <br />Environmental groups, PWC users and manufacturers, and land managers express differing opinions <br />about the environmental consequences of PWC use, and about the need to manage or to limit this <br />recreational activity. Research conducted on the effects of PWC use is summarized below for water <br />pollution, air pollution, noise, wildlife, shoreline vegetation and erosion effects, and health and safety <br />concerns. <br />Water Pollution <br />The vast majority of personal watercraft in use today are two- stroke, non - direct - injection (carbureted) <br />engines, which discharge as much as 30% of their fuel directly into the water (NPS 1999; CARB 1999). <br />Hydrocarbons, benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene (BTEX) are also released, as well as methyl <br />tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) in states that use this additive. In 1996, the Environmental Protection Agency <br />promulgated a rule to control exhaust emissions from new marine engines, including outboards and <br />personal watercraft. Emission controls provide for increasingly stricter standards beginning in model year <br />1996 (EPA 1997). The amount of pollution directly attributed to personal watercraft compared to other <br />motorboats, and the degree to which personal watercraft affect water quality remains debatable. As noted <br />in a report by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, every water body has different <br />conditions (e.g., water temperature, air temperature, water mixing, motorboat use, and winds) that affect <br />the pollutants' impacts (ODEQ 1999). <br />A recent study conducted by the California Air Resources Board consisted of a laboratory test designed to <br />comparatively evaluate exhaust emissions from marine and PWC engines, in particular two- and four - <br />stroke engines (CARB 2001). The results of this study showed a difference in emission (in some cases <br />10 times higher total hydrocarbons in two- stroke engines) between these two types of engines. An <br />exception was air emissions of nitrogen oxides (NO,,) which was higher in four - stroke than in two- stroke <br />engines. Concentrations of pollutants (MTBE and BTEX) in the tested water were consistently higher for <br />two- stroke engines. <br />In 1996, the Environmental Protection Agency estimated an overall 52% reduction in hydrocarbon <br />emissions from marine engines from present levels by 2010, and a 75% reduction by 2030, based on <br />conversion of polluting machines. The 1997 EPA rule delayed implementation by one year (EPA 1996a, <br />1997). However, changing from two- stroke carbureted engines to two- stroke direct - injection engines may <br />result in increases of airborne particulate- associated PAH (Kado et al. 2000). Polycyclic aromatic <br />hydrocarbons (PAH), including benzo(a)pyrene, naphthalene, and 1- methyl naphthalene, are released <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.