My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Results of a Survey of CO Warmwater Anglers Residing in Delta, Garfield, Mesa and Montrose Counties
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
Results of a Survey of CO Warmwater Anglers Residing in Delta, Garfield, Mesa and Montrose Counties
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2010 2:17:02 PM
Creation date
7/16/2010 12:36:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Colorado River Basin Threatened and Endangered Species UCRBRIP
State
CO
Date
4/1/1996
Author
Colorado Division of Wildlife, Standage Market Research, Inc.
Title
Results of a Survey of CO Warmwater Anglers Residing in Delta, Garfield, Mesa and Montrose Counties
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />Analysis of the support question by "Source of Information" seems to indicate that <br />among those who most strongly supported the project, television and the Division of <br />Wildlife were their sources of information. Conversely among those who most <br />strongly opposed the project at the time of the survey, their information sources were • <br />radio and public meetings (Figures 16 and 17). <br />Support for Proposed Project Restocking Options <br />Respondents were asked about how much they supported each of the three options <br />for managing ponds once resident fish had been removed. The three choices were: <br />1) either not stock fish at all, or 2) stock only with trout at certain times of the year, <br />or 3) stock only bass, crappie, and bluegill if the fish can't escape from the pond. <br />• <br />Not surprisingly, ver few an anglers, only 8% opted to leave the ponds empty, while • <br />Y 9 Y P p p Y� <br />52 % supported the trout restocking option and 75% supported the use of bass, <br />crappie and bluegill (Figure 18). <br />Impact on License Buying <br />• <br />The last impact question asked western slope warmwater anglers was whether or not <br />a decrease in warmwater fishing opportunities in the local area would affect their <br />purchase of fishing licenses in the future. Most of the anglers surveyed (82 %) plan <br />to continue purchasing Colorado Fishing Licenses in the future, even if projects such <br />as the one described leave them with fewer warmwater fishing opportunities. 12% <br />said they feel strongly that it would negatively influence their license buying, and 4% <br />said it would, but not so strongly (Figure 19). <br />14 <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.