Laserfiche WebLink
o Flows of 35 cf s at Platoro Reservoir and 100 cf s at the <br />Highway 17 bridge during the summer months, and natural <br />flows during winter months, were considered necessary <br />to accomplish the purposes of designation. Summer <br />flows drop below those recommended on occassion. Thus, <br />it was'suggested that the Forest Service should issue <br />no further permits for water development projects on <br />its .lands . <br />o Acquisition of existing water rights was not <br />recommended. <br />0 No conflict with the Rio Grande Compact was <br />anticipated. <br />o Campground rehabilitation and replacement would occur. <br />o Reconstruction of 25.6 miles of trail would be <br />required. <br />0 A Recreational Forester would be required to administer <br />the area. <br />o A capital investment of $1,900,000 and an annual <br />maintenance and administrative cost of $111,000 would <br />be required. <br />Current Legislation (S. 1 084) <br />S. 1084 would delete a two -mile segment below Platoro <br />Reservoir, which was recommended for designation in the final <br />study report. This would eliminate several tracts of private <br />land from designation. <br />/bm <br />-3- <br />