My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Water Management Symposium 1994 Report
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Water Management Symposium 1994 Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2010 1:13:31 PM
Creation date
7/15/2010 2:02:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Endangered Species Act: Fisheries
State
AK
CA
CO
AZ
KS
ID
MT
NE
NM
NV
ND
OK
OR
SD
TX
UT
WA
WY
Date
10/5/1994
Author
Western States Water Council, Western Governors' Association, Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies
Title
Water Management Symposium 1994 Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• WATER MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM 1994 <br />The Effect of the Endangered Species Act on Western Water Management: <br />Improving ESA Implementation <br />Cosponsored by the Western States Water Council, the Western Governors' Association, <br />and the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies <br />Report on the October 5 -7, 1994 Symposium at Grand Junction, Colorado' <br />OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY <br />I. BACKGROUND <br />The Endangered Species Act (ESA) originally became law in 1973. Its goal and methods were <br />unparalleled in United States history, embodying our Nation's commitment to end the extinction <br />of species, still occurring at an unprecedented rate. One of the ESA's earliest successes was the <br />preservation of the bald eagle, symbol of this Nation. Since that time, many other species have <br />is been preserved through the efforts of federal agencies, states and private persons under the ESA. <br />The history of the ESA has not been an unqualified success, however. Although few would <br />quarrel with its goals, the severe and sometimes draconian measures employed to secure those <br />ends, and the sometimes limited success of such measures, have engendered sharp criticism of <br />the act. From the western states' perspective, one of the most critical failings has been the <br />federal government's often inflexible and autocratic approach to listing and recovery planning . <br />States have been given only limited opportunities to fashion the remedies required under the <br />ESA, yet have borne a major share of the recovery burden and have been required to dedicate <br />significant state and private resources toward the recovery of listed species. <br />For member states of the Western States Water Council, these concerns have been magnified by <br />the fact that state water allocations can be significantly impacted by ESA decisions to protect <br />aquatic species. These impacts and possible remedies were identified in a paper prepared by <br />' This report constitutes a compilation of the presentations, as well as a summary of the <br />proceedings and an overview of the background leading up to the symposium. While every <br />effort has been made to accurately reflect the proceedings, the staff of the WSWC assumes <br />responsibility for any errors made in summarizing and synthesizing the discussion and <br />presentations. This report summarizes only the symposium proceedings and its working groups' <br />recommendations and is not an attempt to characterize formal positions of the Western <br />Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, the Western States Water Council, the Western <br />Governors' Association, or the members of these organizations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.