My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CWCB vs. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District - Adjudication of RICD under SB 01-216
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
CWCB vs. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District - Adjudication of RICD under SB 01-216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2010 12:39:05 PM
Creation date
7/14/2010 3:45:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Gunnison RICD
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
3/14/2005
Author
CWCB, Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District
Title
CWCB vs. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District - Adjudication of RICD under SB 01-216
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
decreed water rights for the course's stream flow requirements, <br />Applicant filed an application for a RICD in March 2002. <br />In its RICD filing, Applicant claimed variable, daytime <br />stream flows ranging from 270 to 1500 cubic feet per second <br />(cfs). These variable flows totaled approximately 157,000 acre <br />feet annually — over 41 percent of the Gunnison River's <br />available stream flow. Applicant claimed the highest flows only <br />during the last two weeks of June and the first two weeks of <br />July, when water supplies were ample. The course was designed <br />with diversion structures incorporating both low flow and high <br />flow channels in order to maximize use of the whitewater course <br />by all skill levels throughout the recreational boating season, <br />even as stream flows decreased. Applicant claimed no water for <br />the months October through April. <br />The CWCB reviewed Applicant's claimed RICD, accepting both <br />oral and written comments from Applicant and other interested <br />parties. Following deliberations., the CWCB issued written <br />findings and recommendations to the water court. The CWCB did <br />not evaluate the application strictly as submitted by Applicant, <br />but rather found that "the RICD stream flow will <br />1 <br />May <br />1 -15 <br />May <br />16 -31 <br />June <br />1 -15 <br />June <br />16 -30 <br />July <br />1 -15 <br />July <br />16 -31 <br />Aug. <br />1 -15 <br />Aug. <br />16 -31 <br />Sept. <br />1 -15 <br />Sept. <br />16 -30 <br />570 <br />1190 <br />1460 <br />1500 <br />1100 <br />530 <br />460 <br />390 <br />1 300 <br />270 <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.