Laserfiche WebLink
The direct influence of flow on the fish community was studied by comparing density, size and <br />age structure of two river reaches with flow condition over the two -year study period. Admittedly, <br />two years of data is insufficient to statistically determine relationships between flows and the fish <br />community. However, implications made from only two years of fish data were strengthened by the <br />fact that the fish sampling done in March 1994 was conducted following a very high flow year and <br />the March 1995 fish sample immediately followed a very low flow year. The minimum flow prior to <br />fish sampling in 1994 was 1430 cfs, and it was 1200 cfs prior to sampling in 1995. Density and <br />biomass estimates were very similar between these two years, which suggested that the observed <br />minimum stream flows had not differentially impacted survivorship of any species or older life stage <br />in the fish community. A relationship was indicated for peak flow conditions and numbers of young - <br />of -year fish. In early June 1993 flow peaked at 22,000 cfs (fish were sampled the following March), <br />while peak flow in 1994 was only 11,000 cfs. Fish larvae and fry numbers were much higher in <br />March 1995, following the low flow year, compared to fish of this size collected in March 1994. It <br />was postulated that roundtail chub and white sucker nursery habitat conditions in the main channel <br />were improved in the 1994 summer compared to 1993, which could explain the increase in number <br />of small fish in March 1995 compared to March 1994. However, since neither Colorado squawfish <br />or razorback suckers are currently part of this fish community, no empirical data was available for <br />studying effects of maxima or minima flows on the habitats of these species. In spite of this, the <br />author speculated that the minimum flow, which apparently was adequate to protect habitats of the <br />native sucker and chub (1,200 cfs), would also probably provide adequate protection for adult <br />Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker habitats. <br />Insufficient data was collected to determine the impacts of peak flows on habitat availability <br />for endangered, other native and nonnative fishes. It is believed that razorback sucker exploit low <br />velocity backwater and flooded habitats during runoff for their nursery and rearing habitats and <br />therefore were vulnerable when these habitats were severely impacted by channelization activities and <br />reduced peaked flows. Remaining floodplain ponds and backwaters were found to be dominated by <br />nonnative species. Further reductions in peak flow, without compensatory channel restructuring, <br />could likely result in further habitat degradation and concomitant increases in nonnative fish numbers <br />thereby complicating recovery efforts. Availability of spawning and nursery habitat for Colorado <br />squawfish was not considered limiting. Adults residing above the diversion dams may chose to move <br />to downstream spawning sites. Even if squawfish spawn above the dams, e.g. in Debeque Canyon, <br />larvae would probably display a strong tendency for downstream dispersal to nursery areas. It was <br />suggested that experimental stocking of small razorback sucker and Colorado squawfish could be <br />useful for studying effects of peak flow on habitat availability for fish of this life stage. <br />Key words: Colorado River, fishery assessment, habitat assessment, endangered fish, species <br />composition, flow recommendations, endangered fish stocking <br />viii <br />