My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Bean Lake III Decision: The Implications
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
Bean Lake III Decision: The Implications
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2010 12:35:09 PM
Creation date
7/9/2010 3:06:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
RICD
State
CO
MT
Date
1/1/3000
Author
Montana DNRC
Title
Bean Lake III Decision: The Implications
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The potential impacts that result from this decision are summarized below. <br />Claim Type <br />Total Claims <br />Total Claims <br />220,000+ <br />Purpose = Fish, Wildlife or Recreation <br />13,415 <br />Physical Means of Diversion or Impoundment <br />9,185 <br />No Physical Means of Diversion or Impoundment <br />4,230 <br />Direct From Source Wildlife <br />3,510 <br />BLM <br />3,270 <br />Other " Instream Flow" <br />720 <br />Private <br />422 <br />Federal <br />145 <br />State <br />153 <br />Board of Land Commissioners <br />2 <br />DFWP <br />151 <br />Murphy Rights <br />106 <br />Other DFWP <br />45 <br />Of the total 220,000+ claims that were filed statewide, 13,415 claimed some type of <br />fish, wildlife, or recreational purpose. Of those, 9,185 identified some type of physical <br />diversion, impoundment, or capture of the water, such as by dams or ditches or <br />pipelines. Most of the remaining 4,230 claims have not yet been examined by the <br />DNRC. Often, examination of these claims and further discussions with the <br />claimants reveals that there was some physical manipulation of the water, such as a <br />spring development, dam, or excavation that was not reported on the original claim <br />form. Therefore, number of actual "instream flow" claims will eventually be less than <br />4,000. <br />In fact, 3,510 of those 4,230 claims identify wildlife drinking "directly from source" and <br />may be overlapping with instream livestock watering rights. Most of these were filed <br />by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in north central and northeastern <br />Montana for water out of small pits and some natural potholes. That leaves a total of <br />720 claims that may be equated as "typical" for instream flows or inlake water levels. <br />Four hundred twenty -two of the 720 real instream flow claims were filed by private <br />parties, which are questionable because language in the statutes as well Bean Lake <br />111 decision appears to limit who could file these types of water right claims to the <br />Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks (DFWP), and possibly federal <br />agencies. That leaves 298 government instream and inlake claims, of which 106 are <br />based on the "Murphy Rights" established by the legislature in the late 1960s. <br />If you recall, Murphy Rights are the water rights created by the Legislature with early - <br />1970's priority dates to protect in- stream flows for fisheries on twelve of Montana's <br />most pristine blue ribbon rivers. Those twelve streams being Big Spring and Rock <br />Creeks, the Blackfoot, Gallatin, Madison, Smith, Upper Missouri, Upper Yellowstone, <br />and Flathead Rivers, and the North, South and Middle Forks of the Flathead. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.