Laserfiche WebLink
In- Stream Flow: Wyoming (Draining the West ?) <br />Senator Cale Case: "It was passed <br />reluctantly by the Legislature <br />because there was a citizens <br />initiative that was going to take <br />precedence if the Legislature <br />didn't act. " <br />E3 View the full I rite rvie <br />Dan Budd: "I was involved in the Legislature when the <br />instream flow laws were proposed and of course resisted <br />them with all of my ability. You can't eat recreation, and <br />you can't eat scenery. " <br />Tom Annear: "If development comes to the Green River <br />basin ... we would at least have that safety net, called <br />instream flow water right that would let you keep a little of <br />that water in the stream. " <br />View the full Interview <br />Dan Budd: "My objection to the instream flow is that under <br />Wyoming water law, it ensures there will be instream flow <br />because of prior appropriation doctrine, what the return <br />flow returns back into the river to keep the river alive. <br />Before irrigation some of these streams dried up because <br />they didn't have the bank storage to keep the stream alive <br />during the long period when you'd have short water years." <br />Under Wyoming law only the state Game and Fish <br />Department can apply for an instream flow permit. In the <br />16 years since the law passed, the agency has made 83 <br />instream flow applications, of which only 17 have been <br />approved. <br />Patrick Tyrell : "That seems like a <br />lot of applications and few <br />permits but these are permits <br />that come in. They involve the <br />cooperative works of three <br />agencies and they require a public <br />hearing. " <br />View the full interview <br />Tom Annear: "It seems to be a different pace than when you <br />look at other water rights during that same time period. I <br />think there have been over 75,000 water rights for all other <br />purposes applied for in the past 16 years. " <br />Cale Case: ". . . we've only managed to protect 50 miles of <br />river in that whole time. The last application was approved <br />in 1996. They've averaged about one a year, or maybe less <br />than one a year. So it's kind of been a rough go. " <br />Anglers are not the only advocates of greater flexibility in <br />the instream flow law. Municipal and economic development <br />officials, and ordinary citizens, want reliable water flows <br />through their towns. <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />environmental causes mix <br />Early blizzard saved Denver's <br />water supply in 2003 <br />Colorado farmers taking their <br />water to market <br />Salt Lake officials block <br />landowners' vehicles <br />Water concerns stall drilling in <br />Montana <br />Water woes growing in New <br />Mexico <br />Water at heart of Wyoming drilling <br />conflict <br />News provided by <br />Headwaters <br />Refmmifts On t e otK "vws <br />http: / /www.focuswest.org /water /instream.cfrn 1/5/2004 <br />