Laserfiche WebLink
• r <br />blocks of depletion so far have been in Utah, but the Programmatic Opinion for the 15 Mile <br />Reach will cover over 1,000,000 acre feet of historic depletions and at least 40,000 acre feet of <br />new depletions. On the other hand, the legal protection of instream flows under state law has <br />been resisted and sketchy. The most significant flow protection may be the federal commitments <br />to regulate flows physically for fish recovery through the operation of the Flaming Gorge and <br />Aspinall Units of the Colorado River Storage Project, to deliver surplus water from Ruedi and <br />Green - Mountain Reservoirs, and to conserve diversions for the Government Highline Canal. <br />After a decade of seeking to apply state water laws, the lowlights could outweigh highlights that <br />I see: <br />The deliveries of up to 10,000 acre feet of water from Ruedi Reservoir and now 5,200 acre <br />feet from the Wolford Mountain Reservoir to support instream flows in the 15 Mile Reach <br />have been legally protected under state law through agreements with the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board. That works out to an average of 85 cubic feet per second per month of <br />reservoir releases from August through October, which is only about 25% of the average <br />volume of flows needed to the meet the recommendations of the U.S Fish and Wildlife <br />Service for the Reach in those months. <br />• The Utah State Engineer has made an administrative commitment not to approve permits for <br />new diversions on the Green River (down to its confluence with the Duchesne River) that <br />would be inconsistent with the physical regulation of instream flows for fish recovery <br />through the operation of the Flaming Gorge Dam. <br />Two junior instream flow appropriations have been decreed for the 15 Mile Reach. These <br />water rights are limited to return flows of 581 cubic feet per second at the top of the Reach <br />and 300 cubic feet per second near the bottom from July through September. The <br />enforcement of these instream flow rights is subject "poison pills" and is otherwise highly <br />qualified. <br />• The operation of the Orchard Mesa Check has been settled outside of the Recovery Program <br />and diversions for the Government Highline Canal can be further conserved by installing in- <br />canal check dams with Recovery Program funding, but a large percentage of the conserved <br />diversions has yet to be legally protected under state law through the 15 Mile Reach. <br />The Juniper Cross Mountain water rights have not been purchased and converted, and the <br />conversion of conditional water rights to instream flow water rights has been legislatively <br />prohibited almost everywhere else in Colorado. No senior absolute water rights have been <br />purchased for conversion to instream flow protection, largely because of the concern about <br />drying up agricultural lands. <br />• We have spent an enormous amount of time and money in a sometimes bitter and still <br />ongoing debate over the scientific uncertainties in the flow recommendations from the U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service and there has been little deference to the Service's or the Colorado <br />