Laserfiche WebLink
Because the Decree of the water court is final and has resolved all issues pending <br />before the water court, there was no need for a C.R.C.P. 54 (b) certification. <br />D. Date the Judgment and Decree was entered and the date of mailing to counsel <br />The Decree was entered by the water judge and mailed to counsel on June 13, 2001. <br />E . Whether there were any extensions granted to file any motions for post -trial <br />relief. <br />No post trial motions were filed, and no extensions to do so were requested. <br />F . The date any motion for post -trial relief was filed. <br />Not applicable. <br />G . The date any motion for post -trial relief was denied or deemed denied <br />Not applicable. <br />H . Whether there were any extensions granted to file any notice of appeal <br />No extension to file the Notice of Appeal was requested. <br />H. ADVISORY LISTING OF ISSUES TO BE RAISED ON APPEAL. <br />A. Whether the water court erred in not setting a duty of water for recreational <br />boating uses. <br />B. Whether the water court erred in allowing an instream use of water contrary to <br />the provisions of § 37 -92- 102(3), 10 C.R.S. (2000); <br />C. Whether the water court erred in awarding an impermissible riparian water <br />right; <br />D. Whether the Supreme Court should repudiate a portion of its opinion in the Ft. <br />Collins decision; <br />E. Whether the water court improperly applied the opinion in Ft. Collins to this <br />case; <br />3 <br />