My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Applicants' Response to State's Motion for Summary Judgement on the Relevance of SB 212
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
Applicants' Response to State's Motion for Summary Judgement on the Relevance of SB 212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2010 1:24:11 PM
Creation date
7/7/2010 2:47:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Case No. 00CW259 Vail RICD and Case No. 00CW281 Breckenridge RICD
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/21/2002
Author
Glenn E. Porzak, Steven J. Bushong, P. Fritz Hollerman
Title
Applicants' Response to State's Motion for Summary Judgement on the Relevance of SB 212
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MAR -27 -2002 17:08 FROM -DOL NATURAL RESOURCES 3038663558 T-711 P.007 /009 F -015 <br />is set forth in detail in their "Response to Rule 56(h) Motion Requesting Determination That <br />Recreation Rights Must Be Impounded" that is filed concurrently with this response. <br />Respectfully submitted this day of March, 2002, <br />PORZAK BROWNING & BUSHONG LLP <br />Glenn E. Porzak <br />Steven J. Bushong ( #21782) <br />P. Fritz Holleman ( #21888) <br />Attorneys for the Eagle River Water & Sanitation District <br />and the Town of Breckenridge <br />Ph0454 -6_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.