My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Trial Brief (2)
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Trial Brief (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2010 1:24:29 PM
Creation date
7/7/2010 2:44:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Case No. 00CW259 Vail RICD and Case No. 00CW281 Breckenridge RICD
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/1/2002
Author
Ken Salazar, Susan Schneider, John Cyran, Shana Smilovits
Title
Trial Brief
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The economic benefits derived from leaving the water in stream for parks, <br />recreation or scenery do not constitute a beneficial use. Empire Water & Power Co. v. <br />Cascade Town Co. 205 F. 123 (8 Cirri. 1913). <br />The Applicant's claim is not reasonable because it appropriates virtually the entire <br />hydrograph. Water must not be appropriated "so as to deprive a whole neighborhood or <br />community of it uses, and vest an absolute monopoly in a single individual." Schodde <br />224 U.S. at 121, 32 S.Ct. at 473; see also Bender 366 P.2d at 555. <br />VI. CONCLUSION <br />Dated this th day of April 2002. <br />KEN SALAZAR <br />Attorney General <br />SUSAN SCHNEIDER, 19961* <br />JOHN CYRAN, 23144* <br />SHANA SMILOVITS, 32186* <br />Assistant Attorneys General <br />Water Rights Unit <br />Natural Resources and Environment Section <br />Attorneys for State of Colorado <br />*Counsel of Record <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.