My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reply to Response to 56(h) Motion for Determination of Question of Law
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
Reply to Response to 56(h) Motion for Determination of Question of Law
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2010 1:24:37 PM
Creation date
7/7/2010 2:40:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Case No. 00CW259 Vail RICD and Case No. 00CW281 Breckenridge RICD
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/8/2002
Author
Ken Salazar, Susan Schneider, John Cyran
Title
Reply to Response to 56(h) Motion for Determination of Question of Law
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION 5 <br />COLORADO <br />109 8 Street, Suite 104 <br />Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 <br />CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR WATER <br />RIGHTS OF THE EAGLE RIVER WATER AND <br />SANITATION DISTRICT, <br />IN EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO. <br />AND <br />CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR WATER <br />RIGHTS OF THE TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE, <br />IN SUMMIT COUNTY, COLORADO. <br />A� COURT USE ONLY <br />Ken Salazar, Attorney General <br />Case Numbers: OOCW259 and <br />Susan J. Schneider, #19961, Assistant Attorney General* <br />OOCW281 <br />John Cyran, 423144, Assistant Attorney General* <br />1525 Sherman Street, 5"' Floor <br />Division: 5 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />(303) 866 -5046 <br />(303) 866 -5358 <br />*Counsel of Record <br />REPLY TO RESPONSE TO 56(h) MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF QUESTION <br />OF LAW <br />Objectors Colorado Water Conservation Board, and the State and Division <br />Engineers (collectively the "State "), through their undersigned counsel, and pursuant to <br />C.R.C.P. 56(H), hereby submit this Reply to Response to Motion for Determination of <br />Question of Law. In support of the Reply Motion, the State asserts the following: <br />I. THE PLAIN LANGUAGE OF SECTION 37 -92- 103(4), C.R.S. (2001) <br />REQUIRES THE APPLICANTS TO PROVE THAT THE WATER CLAIMED <br />FOR RECREATIONAL USES IS IMPOUNDED IN THE VAIL AND <br />BRECKENRIDGE WHITEWATER COURSE STRUCTURES. <br />Section 37- 92- 103(4), C.R.S. (2001) states: <br />"Beneficial use" is the use of that amount of water that is reasonable and <br />appropriate under reasonably efficient practices to accomplish without waste the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.