Laserfiche WebLink
t� <br />6. Breckenridge has satisfied the can and will elements of § 37- 92- 305(9)(b) C.R.S. <br />(2000) with respect to the claimed rights. <br />7. The legal descriptions of the control structures set forth in the application are <br />accurate. <br />8. The source for the claimed water rights is the Blue River, a tributary to the <br />Colorado River. <br />9. Mr. Williamsen is an expert in the fields of water rights engineering and water <br />rights administration. <br />10. Dr. Danielson is an expert in the fields of water rights engineering and water right <br />administration. <br />11. Dr. Raucher is an expert in the field of economics. <br />12. The water rights .sought by this application are completely non- consumptive. <br />13. The Town of Breckenridge spent in excess of $500,000 on construction of the <br />Whitewater Course. <br />14. The flow of water has been significantly altered by the structures from the pre - <br />course condition and changed both left and right on the horizontal plane and up <br />and down on the vertical plane. <br />15. Water in the amounts claimed for the course are available for appropriation in the <br />Blue River. <br />16. The water rights sought by Breckenridge are capable of administration. <br />17. The water rights claimed by Breckenridge will not injure any existing water <br />rights. <br />18. The water rights claimed should not be denied because of any impact on <br />Colorado's interstate compact entitlements. <br />Tm0294 <br />