My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Yampa River Basin Water Resources Planning Model Final Report
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Yampa River Basin Water Resources Planning Model Final Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2010 1:04:19 PM
Creation date
7/6/2010 11:25:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Yampa River Basin
State
CO
UT
WY
Basin
Yampa/White/Green
Water Division
6
Date
2/1/1997
Author
Boyle Engineering Coporation, Riverside Technology, Inc.
Title
Yampa River Basin Water Resources Planning Model Final Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and evaporation impacts on gaged streamflows. The contents are also used in the historical reservoir <br />target file for calibration. <br />The following assumptions were made to create the EOM reservoir content data file: <br />• If an observation for the last day of the month was available from the CRDSS database, it was <br />used directly as the EOM value. <br />• If an observation for the last day of the month was not available from the CRDSS database, the <br />observation closest to the last day of the month within 15 days of the last day of the month was <br />used. <br />• If no observations existed within 15 days of the last day of the month, a search for the nearest <br />observation forward and backward in time from the last day of the month was made, and a linear <br />interpolation was made to obtain the EOM value. <br />• The period prior to the construction of a reservoir was filled with values of zero. It was assumed <br />that the first date encountered in the database was the date of construction <br />• End -of -month content for the aggregated reservoirs was assigned as follows: 100 percent full <br />from October to June, 75 percent full at the end of July, 25 percent full at the end of August, and <br />empty at the end of September. This schedule was developed to simulate reservoir use as a <br />supplemental irrigation supply during late summer. <br />• End -of -month content for aggregated stockponds was estimated as full at all times, because <br />historical data are unavailable. <br />Appendix C, Section 7.3 discusses the alternate data sources for each reservoir. Table 4.3.3a <br />presents the data period available for each explicitly modeled reservoir as well as target levels. <br />TABLE 4.3.3A <br />Reservoir EOM and Target Data <br />Reservoir <br />Period of Record <br />Operational Target <br />Stillwater <br />1950 -1993 <br />Full <br />Yamcolo <br />1980 -1993 <br />Full <br />Allen Basin <br />1909 -1993 <br />Full <br />Sta ecoach <br />1988 -1993 <br />Full <br />Lake Catamount <br />1977 -1993 <br />Full <br />Fish Creek <br />1956 -1993 <br />Full <br />Steamboat Lake <br />1974 -1993 <br />Full <br />Lester Creek <br />1974 -1993 <br />Full <br />Elkhead <br />1976 -1993 <br />Full <br />Phase IIIa enhancements that impacted the reservoir end -of -month content file included adding three <br />aggregated reservoirs and three aggregated stockponds. Appendix D.11 describes these Phase IIIa <br />enhancements <br />Reservoirs 4 -14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.