My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Yampa River Basin Research Final Synthesis Report
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Yampa River Basin Research Final Synthesis Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2010 1:07:33 PM
Creation date
7/6/2010 11:13:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Yampa River Basin
State
CO
UT
WY
Basin
Yampa/White/Green
Water Division
6
Date
11/1/1999
Author
Ayres Associates
Title
Yampa River Basin Research Final Synthesis Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2.1.3. Juniper Project Water Rights <br />Several water development projects were earmarked for future development on the Yampa River <br />based on an inventory completed by U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) in the late 1940s. The <br />Juniper Reservoir was such a project. The Colorado River Water Conservation District ( CRWCD) <br />was granted the conditional water rights for this project in 1954. The Juniper Project has not <br />progressed further than planning stages because of cost and environmental permitting issues. <br />The Juniper Project water rights are believed to be the controlling water rights on the Yampa <br />River due to their early priority date and their location downstream from junior water rights. The <br />original decree for the Juniper Project water rights is Juniper Reservoir (844,000 af), Deadman <br />Bench Canal, and a hydropower plant located approximately 5 miles upstream from Maybell. The <br />Juniper Project water right could potentially consume 862,000 of per year, or 75 percent of the <br />annual yield of the river at the Maybell gage. <br />The CRWCD proposed to use a portion of these rights for instream flow purposes. This would <br />require the Colorado Water Court to grant a change of use for the volume of water to be left in <br />the stream for fish and wildlife. Approximately 40,000 of are diverted annually under water rights <br />junior to the Juniper rights. Many of these junior water rights were diverting water prior to the <br />priority date of the Juniper rights; however, theirs were not decreed until after the Juniper rights. <br />To avoid penalizing the junior water users for not declaring their rights earlier, CRWCD agreed to <br />let them divert up to 65,000 of of water before the CRWCD enforced its senior water rights. <br />However, this concession, in effect, devalued the Juniper rights to the extent they were no better <br />than the most junior rights. <br />' 2.2. Endangered Species Act <br />The Endangered Species Act (ESA) was passed in 1973 and directs the federal government to <br />conserve listed species and their critical habitats. It prohibits federal agencies from taking any <br />actions that jeopardize the continued existence of any listed threatened and endangered (T &E) <br />species. Within the Colorado River Basin, four T &E species have been listed under the ESA: <br />Colorado pikeminnow (formerly Colorado squawfish, Ptychocheilus lucius), humpback chub (Gila <br />' cypha), bonytail (Gila elegans) and razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus). <br />� I <br /> I 1 <br />Because much of the water is consumed by direct -flow water rights, however, there may not be <br />enough water available to satisfy all demands, when demand is high and supply is low, as in late <br />summer. In this case, under Colorado water law, senior water rights would have priority to divert <br />' <br />water over junior water rights. A "call' on the river by a holder of a senior water right would <br />require that holders of junior rights upstream from the senior right allow water to bypass their <br />headgates in order to satisfy the senior right. Only after senior rights are satisfied, may junior <br />rights take water from the river. <br />However, honoring senior calls would require the State Engineer to administer the river. To date <br />the lower Yampa River has not been administered, because senior rights have placed no calls on <br />the river, even though some senior rights may have experienced shortages in the past. Also, <br />administration would require a means of measuring and regulating in real time the flow of water <br />into ditches and reservoirs. Moreover, the State Engineer may not enforce a senior call if that <br />' <br />senior does not have the means to take all of the water that it needs. <br />2.1.3. Juniper Project Water Rights <br />Several water development projects were earmarked for future development on the Yampa River <br />based on an inventory completed by U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) in the late 1940s. The <br />Juniper Reservoir was such a project. The Colorado River Water Conservation District ( CRWCD) <br />was granted the conditional water rights for this project in 1954. The Juniper Project has not <br />progressed further than planning stages because of cost and environmental permitting issues. <br />The Juniper Project water rights are believed to be the controlling water rights on the Yampa <br />River due to their early priority date and their location downstream from junior water rights. The <br />original decree for the Juniper Project water rights is Juniper Reservoir (844,000 af), Deadman <br />Bench Canal, and a hydropower plant located approximately 5 miles upstream from Maybell. The <br />Juniper Project water right could potentially consume 862,000 of per year, or 75 percent of the <br />annual yield of the river at the Maybell gage. <br />The CRWCD proposed to use a portion of these rights for instream flow purposes. This would <br />require the Colorado Water Court to grant a change of use for the volume of water to be left in <br />the stream for fish and wildlife. Approximately 40,000 of are diverted annually under water rights <br />junior to the Juniper rights. Many of these junior water rights were diverting water prior to the <br />priority date of the Juniper rights; however, theirs were not decreed until after the Juniper rights. <br />To avoid penalizing the junior water users for not declaring their rights earlier, CRWCD agreed to <br />let them divert up to 65,000 of of water before the CRWCD enforced its senior water rights. <br />However, this concession, in effect, devalued the Juniper rights to the extent they were no better <br />than the most junior rights. <br />' 2.2. Endangered Species Act <br />The Endangered Species Act (ESA) was passed in 1973 and directs the federal government to <br />conserve listed species and their critical habitats. It prohibits federal agencies from taking any <br />actions that jeopardize the continued existence of any listed threatened and endangered (T &E) <br />species. Within the Colorado River Basin, four T &E species have been listed under the ESA: <br />Colorado pikeminnow (formerly Colorado squawfish, Ptychocheilus lucius), humpback chub (Gila <br />' cypha), bonytail (Gila elegans) and razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus). <br />� I <br /> I 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.