Laserfiche WebLink
l <br />are typically found in backwaters or flooded riparian areas where water temperatures are higher than <br />in the main river (Wick et al. 1983). As high flows recede, adults move toward spawning areas, <br />often migrating over 100 miles. Spawning areas are typically riffle -run areas with cobble substrates. <br />Following spawning (typically in July), the adults often move back to the areas they migrated from. <br />In the Green River, some adults spend most of their time in tributaries, such as the White River or <br />upper Yampa River. They move down the tributaries to spawning sites and then back up the <br />tributaries following spawning. Other adults live in the main rivers, such as the Green and Colorado, <br />year- round, migrating up or down the river to their spawning sites. Adults are typically found in runs <br />along shorelines during the summer and fall, probably using low velocity pockets alongside the main <br />current. During winter, adults move relatively little and prefer slow velocity habitats (Valdez and <br />Masslich 1989) such as slow runs, slackwaters, eddies, and backwaters. <br />Studies in the San Juan River have generally shown that habitat use by adult Colorado squawfish is <br />generally similar to that seen in other Upper Basin rivers, but some differences do occur. Based on <br />83 ground contacts of radio - tagged adult Colorado squawfish over a 5 -year period, 52 percent of the <br />contacts were from run habitats, 18 percent were from eddy habitats, and 12 percent were from <br />shoreline habitats (Ryden and Pfeifer 1993, 1994, 1995a, 1996a). This differed from the habitats <br />' used in the Green and Yampa rivers where shorelines were used more than 50 percent of the time <br />and may be related to the prevalence of run habitat in the San Juan System. <br />During the summer, patterns of habitat use appeared to be related to spawning activities (i.e., staging, <br />egg deposition, and resting) and, in general, conformed to patterns observed in other populations <br />during the same period. Miller (1994a, 1995) intensively followed Colorado squawfish radio - tagged <br />' by Ryden and Pfeifer (1994, 1995a) during the spring and summer of 1993 and 1994. During June <br />and early July the fish staged in eddies, slackwaters, and secondary channels that were often warmer <br />than the main river, including the mouth of the Mancos River. The Mancos River (RM 122.6) is the <br />only tributary that is currently used by Colorado squawfish in the San Juan System, and then only <br />at its mouth during runoff periods. The mouth of the Mancos River is dammed by the flow of the <br />San Juan River at this time and provides a warmer, backwater habitat. By mid -July all the fish <br />moved out of staging areas to spawning sites at RM 131 and RM 132 within an area called the <br />"Mixer" (an extensively braided section of the river from RM 129.8 to RM 133.4). During 1994, <br />spawning activities were observed over cobble bar habitats in close proximity to, but in different <br />locations from, the spawning activity noted in 1993. During the time spent in the spawning area, the <br />fish used run habitats about 60 percent of the time and eddy and slackwater areas about 35 percent <br />of the time. These habitats were adjacent to the fast, chute -type habitats where actual spawning <br />likely occurred and were probably used for resting and feeding during the spawning period. <br />Spawning chutes were characterized by fast water velocity and clean loose cobble with a median <br />' diameter of 60 -80 mm. One site (RM 131.1) had overhanging vegetation providing shade and cover <br />(Miller 1995). Following spawning, the fish dispersed upstream and downstream from the spawning <br />area. Run habitat was used the most in the late summer and fall periods, although eddies and <br />' slackwater habitats were still an important part of the habitats used. <br />A limited amount of information on winter habitat use was collected on three adult Colorado <br />squawfish during February 1994 (Miller 1995). Runs were used about 90 percent of the time, and <br />eddies were used the remaining 10 percent of the time. The fish were active, especially during <br />midday, suggesting active feeding. These observations differ from those made by Valdez and <br />Masslich (1989) in the Green River in that Colorado squawfish in the San Juan River were much <br />' San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program December 1997 <br />Summary Report 18 PR -602 -1 <br />