Laserfiche WebLink
run habitat within the study area was similar during low and high flows. Run habitat was generally <br />reduced in canyon reaches (RM 0 to RM 67) except below RM 20. <br />Shoal habitat was the second most abundant habitat type based on total surface area and ranged from <br />2.6 percent of the TWA during December 1992 to 7.3 percent during October 1993. Shoal habitat <br />included sand and cobble shoals, and was most abundant between RM 80 and RM 110. <br />Riffle habitat exhibited variability and appeared to be related to flow. Density (area/mile) of riffles <br />was similar at high (June) and low (October) flow periods, averaging less than 10,000 square meters <br />(m) per mile. However, at intermediate flows during December 1992 and July 1993, density of <br />riffle habitat increased to above 10,000 m per mile. Highest densities of this habitat were found in <br />canyon reaches (RM 0 to RM 67) during this period. In 1994, however, mapping of new areas <br />higher in the system revealed two major riffle areas between RM 160 to RM 180 and RM 210 to RM <br />224 (Bliesner and Lamarra 1995). It was speculated that the primary and secondary production from <br />these areas may represent an important energy source for the native fish community. <br />Slackwater and low velocity habitats represented only a small percentage of the total habitat <br />available. Slackwater habitats composed 0.2 to 1.2 percent of the TWA during the periods mapped, <br />with the highest percentage occurring during low flow in October 1993. Low velocity habitats <br />comprised 1.3 to 1.9 percent of the habitat available between RM 82 to RM 158 with the highest <br />relative availability during both July and October 1993. Within a larger reach, between RM 2 and <br />RM 158, low velocity habitat composed 2.1 percent of the TWA during July 1993. <br />The density of vegetative associated habitats was strongly related to flow, with the highest density <br />occurring during peak flow in June 1993. The dramatic increase in this habitat type during this <br />period was due to inundation of vegetated shoreline areas at flows of 7,200 to 9,960 cfs. These flows <br />were sufficient to inundate large quantities of riparian vegetation, submerged islands; and rewetted <br />abandoned channels that had been revegetated. Mapping at lower flows during December 1993, July <br />1993, and October 1993 showed that densities of vegetative associated habitats were relatively low. <br />Shannon - Wiener diversity indices indicated that habitat was most diverse during low flow periods <br />in December 1992 (Index = 1.42) and October 1993 (Index = 1.42). Habitat diversity was lowest <br />(Index = 0.763) during peak flows in June 1993 and increased to 0.918 during lower flows in July <br />1993. <br />Analysis of aerial videography and habitat mapping conducted during 1994 (Bliesner and Lamarra <br />1995) produced similar results as seen in 1993. Runs were the most abundant habitat type during <br />both high and low flow periods. Vegetative associated habitats was highest during peak flows in <br />June and decreased substantially by August. Relative abundance of riffle, shoal, low velocity, and <br />slackwater habitats was higher during August than in June. <br />Analysis of aerial videography and habitat mapping conducted in November 1994 and April and <br />September of 1995 from RM 2 to RM 180 showed generally similar trends to those of previous <br />years. One exception appeared to be in the vegetative associated habitats, which increased during <br />higher flows in 1994 but appeared to show the opposite trend in 1995. Another difference was the <br />substantial drop in the percentage of TWA represented by low velocity habitat in September 1995 <br />(1.9 percent) compared to August 1994 (4.6 percent). This difference may have been related to <br />San Juan River Recovery Implementation Program December 1997 <br />Summary Report 15 PR -602 -1 <br />