Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />What I would like you to consider is, if we would qualify for assistance even though we are not <br />directly an augmenting group. We were injured by a well group and much of our water is used for <br />augmentation, therefore, it seems that we would qualify. It also seems that as some of these former <br />GASP wells take their augmenta.tion plans through court they would be looked upon more favorably if <br />they could show that their past depletions had been remedied. The Prewitt would be willing to forgive <br />the past injury upon accepta.nce of grant money from the drought program. <br />The amount of money in our invoice to GASP was an initial estimate of what the water was <br />worth to us. The Prewitt is willing to consider alternative prices. If I remember correctly the Central <br />Colorado Water Conservancy District purchased winter water in 2003-2004 for $50 per acre foot. And <br />I believe GASP paid injured parties $30 to $35 per acre foot for winter injury in 2003. <br />If you believe that pursuing this matter through the drought prograrn is viable andlor you <br />require additional information, please let me know. <br />Thank you for your consideration. <br />Sincerely, <br />THE PREWITT OPERATING CONiMITTEE <br />G� <br />• J mes T. Y , P.E. <br />Manager <br />Apper�dix 1 t� �a��tra�t C15U213 <br />