My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CRDSS Task Memorandum 1.14-16
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
CRDSS Task Memorandum 1.14-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2010 12:37:16 PM
Creation date
6/29/2010 1:50:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Consumptive Use
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
5/1/1995
Title
CRDSS Task Memorandum 1.14-16
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
V. r. <br />The daily effective rainfall is assumed equal to 70 percent of the total daily rainfall. The SCS Blaney- <br />Criddle method is used to calculate the effective rainfall by month. The monthly data of the Jay weather <br />station is calculated from the daily weather data. With this approach, both ET methods use the same <br />weather station. The annual carry -over soil moisture coefficient is assumed equal to 0.5. The <br />management allowed depletion varies for each crop (terms defined in Task Memorandum 1.14 -8). <br />Variation in the root length of the crop during the growing season is assumed to be insignificant, and <br />therefore the root length is kept constant. The planting/harvesting dates of a particular crop are kept the <br />same regardless of their location. <br />Figure 1 shows the IWR by subarea as estimated by SCS Blaney - Criddle and Penman- Monteith ET <br />estimation methods. The total IWR for the whole project is 130,270 acre -ft, 116,740 acre -ft, and 136,660 <br />acre -ft for SCS Blaney - Criddle without the enhancements, with the enhancements, and Penman- Monteith, <br />respectively. It is interesting to note that the Penman- Monteith estimates are consistently higher than the <br />estimates of the SCS Blaney - Criddle methods. Figure 2 shows the monthly variation in the IWR for the <br />whole project. The peak requirement occurred in July. It should also be noted that the two forms of the <br />SCS Blaney - Criddle method gave exactly the same values at the falling limb of the curve. This is not true <br />in the rising limb of the curve because SCS Blaney - Criddle method with enhancements assumes that the <br />soil moisture storage is initially at full capacity. This suggests that the main difference between the <br />results of the two forms of the SCS Blaney - Criddle is in the initial part of the growing season. <br />Figures 3, 4, and 5 show the monthly potential ET of selected crops as computed by the SCS Blaney - <br />Criddle and Penman- Monteith methods. The Penman- Monteith estimates are, for the most part, higher <br />than the SCS Blaney - Criddle estimates. <br />3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />A data set is prepared to support the ET computations by SCS Blaney - Criddle and Penman- Monteith. A <br />single weather station that collects daily weather data is identified and used for subareas Delta2, Delta4, <br />Gunnison4, and Montrose2. The computation is performed for 1987 only. <br />The annual IWR for the total area is 130,270 acre -ft, 116,740 acre -ft, and 136,660 acre -ft for SCS <br />Blaney - Criddle without the enhancements, with the enhancements, and Penman- Monteith, respectively. <br />The Penman- Monteith estimates are consistently higher than the estimates of the SCS Blaney - Criddle <br />without the enhancements, but lower than those of the SCS Blaney - Criddle with enhancements. <br />At this time, the period of record for which the comparison between the SCS Blaney - Criddle and the <br />Penman- Monteith is possible is only 1 year; therefore, it is recommended that this information not be <br />used as the basis for the local calibration. When and if additional information is developed, this <br />recommendation should be re- evaluated. <br />4.0 REFERENCE <br />Jensen, M.E., R.D. Burman, and R.G. Allen (1990). "Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Water <br />Requirements." ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 70. American Society of Civil <br />Engineers, New York, New York. <br />A275 05.01.95 L 1.14 -16 XWgueaa <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.