My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ground Water Monitoring Activities Arkansas River Valley Alluvial Aquifer 94-95
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
Ground Water Monitoring Activities Arkansas River Valley Alluvial Aquifer 94-95
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2010 1:22:20 PM
Creation date
6/29/2010 10:24:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
ARCA
State
CO
KS
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
7/8/1997
Author
Commissioner of Agriculture, Colorado Department of Agriculture, Bradford Austin
Title
Ground Water Monitoring Activities Arkansas River Valley Alluvial Aquifer 94-95
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0299 <br />QUALITY ASSURANCE /QUALITY CONTROL <br />SAMPLE COLLECTION METHODS <br />All samples were collected in accordance with the Non -Point Source Task Force protocol <br />for sampling of ground water. Samples were collected from existing wells via outside hydrants or <br />whatever means available prior to any type of treatment (i.e. water softener). As a rule of thumb, <br />three times the volume of water in the well casing plus any volume contained within the <br />associated piping was purged prior to sampling. Rather than attempt to calculate these volumes, <br />a determination of when fresh formation water has reached the point of sampling was verified by <br />measuring pH, conductivity and temperature. A field portable instrument for measuring pH, <br />conductivity and temperature was used for this purpose at each well site. For each well, the pH, <br />conductivity and temperature were measured at periodic intervals (approximately every 5 <br />minutes) while the well was being purged. Water samples were collected when solution chemistry <br />of the ground water had stabilized such that three consecutive readings were within 5 %. It can <br />be reasonably assumed that a stabilization in the values of these parameters indicates that the <br />casing and piping have been purged and fresh formation water had reached the sampling point. <br />Negative bias (loss of constituent) is of significant concern in sampling for volatile <br />compounds. Therefore, great care was taken in sample collection to minimize degassing by <br />operating the sampling port at a low volume. Samples for volatile constituents and those samples <br />which require field filtration were collected first. Samples for nitrate and inorganic analysis were <br />collected next. Samples collected for dissolved metals analysis were filtered in the field with a <br />0.45 micron size filter. <br />In addition, the sampling team collected quality assurance samples consisting of field <br />blanks, periodic duplicate samples, and spiked samples. Field blanks were utilized for field <br />QA/QC performance and subjected to all conditions to which the samples were exposed. <br />Duplicate and spiked samples were prepared for lab calibration checks. <br />The following types of samples were provided for quality assurance: <br />1. Field Blank <br />A blank ground water sample was periodically collected to check field <br />decontamination procedures. The blank was prepared by pouring laboratory <br />supplied deionized water through decontaminated sampling equipment <br />following the collection of possible contaminated samples. <br />2. Duplicates <br />Random duplicate groundwater samples were collected to compare laboratory <br />analysis procedures as well as sample collection procedure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.