My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Hydrologic Effects of Reducing Irrigation to Maintain a Permanent Pool
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
Hydrologic Effects of Reducing Irrigation to Maintain a Permanent Pool
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2010 1:24:00 PM
Creation date
6/28/2010 4:24:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
ARCA
State
CO
KS
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/1/1975
Author
U.S. Geologic Survey, Richard R. Luckey, CWCB, State Engineer, Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District
Title
Hydrologic Effects of Reducing Irrigation to Maintain a Permanent Pool
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0731 <br />• The permanent pool was assumed to contain 10,000 acre -feet (1.2x10 <br />m of water at the start of the simulation and, hence, the initial <br />volume in John Martin Reservoir was increased by a like amount. The <br />permanent pool was limited to 15,000 acre -feet (1.9x10 m but was not <br />allowed to invade the flood- control pool by more than 10,000 acre -feet <br />(1.2x10 7 m 3 ). Neither of these limitations was encountered in the <br />simulation, but the latter condition may be a consideration during times <br />of major flooding. <br />Once the Division of Wildlife's water is stored in John Martin <br />Reservoir, it begins to suffer evaporation losses. Evaporation losses <br />are calculated each month on the basis of the total volume of water in <br />the reservoir. This evaporation is then charged against the permanent <br />pool and other water in the reservoir on the basis of their respective <br />volumes. During a month in which the water is being transferred to John <br />Martin Reservoir, the evaporation charge is one -half of what the charge <br />would be had the water already been in the reservoir. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.