23G - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

concerns. 40 C.F.R. § 1502.9(c)(1)(I). Here, the issuance of an easement changes the legal status of WS SC's authorization, but it does not change either the footprint of the reservoir upon the environment or the operations analyzed in the FEIS The easement gives the Forest Service the right to impose conditions as with a special use permit. Subparagraph I.B. of the Easement provides: "The terms and conditions of this authorization shall be subject to revision in the years 2014, and 2034 to reflect changing times and conditions as specified in subparagraph I.C." (AR- LD at 4899.) Subparagraph I.C. provides: "Upon revision in the years 2014 and 2034, this easement is subject to then - current laws, regulations, Federal and State land use plans and other management decisions of the authorized officer or his or her superior applicable to management of National Forest System lands to the same extent as if the easement had been terminated and a new easement issued except that the question of whether the occupancy is in the public interest and can be continued will be answered in the affirmative." Id. Moreover, the easement can be revoked by the Forest Service if WSSC fails t� comply with the terms and conditions. Id. at 4901. Finally, although the DEIS included a proposed special use permit, both the FEIS and the ROD considered the issuance of a land use authorization. Both the DEIS and the FEIS explained that two of the alternatives being considered were effectively perpetual grants, as is an easement. As the FEIS explained, "Alternatives A and B both establish a policy that has the effect of making the land use and its affects permanent by removing the opportunity for the public to change permit conditions, when that use has been shown to have avoidable adverse effects. This has the effect of converting the temporary land -use authorization into a perpetual grant or property right." (AR -LD at 3126.) The Forest Service's determination that a SEIS was not -33-