My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
23G
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
23G
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2010 1:32:36 PM
Creation date
6/28/2010 1:29:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
4/30/2004
Description
23G
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Executive Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
law;" and (2) management of public lands in a manner "that will protect the quality of scientific, <br />scenic, historical, ecological, environmental, air and atmospheric, water resource, and <br />archeological values; that, where appropriate, will preserve and protect certain public lands in <br />their natural condition; that will provide food and habitat for fish and wildlife and domestic <br />animals, and that will provide for outdoor recreation and human occupancy and use[.]" 43 U S.C. <br />§ 1701(a)(7) &(8). <br />The evidence in the Administrative Record clearly shows that requiring bypass flows was <br />the environmentally preferred alternative. Following a comprehensive assessment of the revised <br />JOP, which was the applicants' attempt to mitigate damage to fish habitat, the Forest Service <br />found that "the applicants' claims of habitat enhancement in the Cache la Poudre River system <br />are overstated." (AR -LD at 4483.) More specifically, the Forest Service stated: <br />Under the JOP, effects to ... Segment 5 of the La Poudre Pass Creek, and to <br />Segment 6 of the Cache la Poudre River remain unchanged from the existing <br />condition. As these negative impacts are considered at increasingly larger scales . <br />.. they become less apparent. However, at the local scale, we believe these are <br />significant environmental effects that are meaningful from a physical, biological, <br />and ecological perspective. Effects to [these segments] are not mitigated under <br />the JOP, but are fully to partially mitigated under Alternative C for a five month <br />period. <br />(AR -LD at 4482 -83.) <br />Additionally, the ROD itself recognized that the "JOP is not as environmentally desirable as <br />bypass flows" because "[c]rrtical habitat conditions occur during months outside those addressed <br />in the JOP.... These months are of equal importance to maintaining aquatic habitat." (AR -LD <br />at 4601.) <br />Under the current operation of Long Draw Reservoir there are extended periods of <br />zero or near zero flow below the reservoir from at least October through March or <br />April, and longer during some years.... The extended periods of zero to near <br />-23- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.