My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Arkansas River Channel Capacity and Riparian Habitat Planning Study
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
Arkansas River Channel Capacity and Riparian Habitat Planning Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2010 11:42:48 AM
Creation date
6/25/2010 4:10:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
ARCA
State
CO
KS
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
8/1/2001
Author
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Title
Arkansas River Channel Capacity and Riparian Habitat Planning Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Type III Analysis on five stream gages as listed above (in accordance with Bulletin 17B, EM <br />1110 -2 -1415, ER 1110 -2 -1450 and the HEC -FFA User Manual. <br />The flow versus the drainage area for the 2 -, 10 -, 50- and 100 -year flows was plotted <br />using an Excel spreadsheet. These plots showed that the peak flows for the 10, 50, and 100 -year <br />frequency primarily occurred at the La Junta stream gage. The 2 -year peak flow occurred at the <br />Nepesta stream gage. The flow typically attenuates downstream as it approaches -the Las Animas <br />stream gage. After discussing these plots with experts at BBC in Davis, California, we decided <br />that some of the missing years of data (flood of 1921} needed to be interpolated and added so <br />that these plots better represent the actual trend of flows. <br />The Moments (mean, standard deviation and skew) versus drainage area was then plotted <br />in a spreadsheet for each of the group of statistics. The mean and standard deviation behaved <br />very well (gradual change in slope of the curves) for ;the period of record. The skew showed no <br />apparent pattern. <br />The Moments versus time was used as a tool to investigate how purported changes in the <br />watershed affect the discharge frequency. A trend analysis was to develop by taking the 10 -year <br />running moments. First we ran the FFA program using 10 -year data sets. Then we plotted them <br />in Excel using the mid -year to define the points. Thr1 plots showed relatively smooth curves. <br />The mean versus time showed a relatively steady trend versus time. The standard deviation <br />versus time showed an increasing trend versus time, which is primarily due to the floods of 1999. <br />The plots of the skews were less consistent. <br />Table 3.2 lists the frequency discharge peaks :generated by the FFA program for selected <br />stations on the Arkansas River. <br />TABLE 3.2 <br />DISCHARGE FREQUENCY PEAKS <br />10.0 % - <br />2.0 % - <br />1.0 %- <br />0.2 %v- <br />Drainage <br />Chance <br />Chance <br />Chance <br />Chance <br />LOCATION <br />Area <br />Flood <br />Flood <br />Flood <br />Flood , <br />(sq nu) <br />Discharge <br />Discharge <br />Discharge <br />Discharge <br />(cfs) <br />(cfs) <br />(cfs) <br />(cfs) <br />Arkansas River near Avondale, CO <br />6327 <br />1 16500 <br />33600 <br />44400 <br />81900 <br />Arkansas River near Nepesta, CO <br />9345 <br />` 19700 <br />39000 <br />50600 <br />88500 <br />Arkansas River at Catlin Dam at Fowler, CO <br />10901 <br />18400 <br />39700 <br />53500 <br />102000 <br />Arkansas River at La Junta, CO <br />12210 <br />.25100 <br />53300 <br />69400 <br />118000 <br />Arkansas River at Las Animas, CO <br />13976 <br />! 17700 <br />40100 <br />53800 <br />98500 <br />28 <br />I L <br />I <br />1'�- <br />1 <br />I. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.