My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Arkansas River Channel Capacity and Riparian Habitat Planning Study
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
Arkansas River Channel Capacity and Riparian Habitat Planning Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2010 11:42:48 AM
Creation date
6/25/2010 4:10:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
ARCA
State
CO
KS
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
8/1/2001
Author
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Title
Arkansas River Channel Capacity and Riparian Habitat Planning Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7 2 <br />Animas that hreato Y g h tes, including cottonwood and salt- cedar, annually consumed <br />p P <br />approximately 15,000 acre-feet of water ( Bittenger and Stringham 1963:13 -15, 17 -21). The <br />cottonwood trees in the valley were, however, in decline. ' <br />While salt -cedar is used by wildlife many researchers report that salt -cedar has little food <br />value and species diversity and density are lower than in the historic and preferred cottonwood - <br />' <br />willow habitat; therefore, the dense salt -cedar stands: have lower wildlife values (Carpenter <br />n.d.:6 -7). Vegetation studies attest to the changes inchannel morphology and to the spread of <br />salt - cedar. Examples include studies on the spread of salt -cedar that indicate that "The oldest <br />and most mature stands of salt -cedar were found near the Colorado- Kansas State line..." near <br />where historic documentation first reports it (Lindauer and Ward 1968:3 -4, 24). Bittenger and <br />Stringham (1963:13 -15) noted a significant increase In salt -cedar between 1936 and 1957 for the <br />, <br />reach of river between La Junta and Las Animas" which was during the drought years. Another <br />example is the fact that the youngest cottonwoods near Bent's Old Fort are located near the <br />present channel in areas that are suitable for seed germination while the oldest cottonwoods are <br />' <br />located about 1,200 feet from the present channel in areas that were once active areas of the <br />floodplain and were suitable for cottonwood seedling germination (Nadler 1978:90 -92). <br />1 concern in recent ears issthe slow disappearance Another biologics y of cottonwood from <br />the valley and its importance in restoring habitat values (Snyder and Miller 1991; USACE <br />1999a:4042; Carpenter n.d.). Cottonwood loss is attributed to the reduction in flooding and <br />declines in the amount of active channel that provided for suitable nursery sites (Lindauer <br />1970:11; Snyder and Miller 1991; Rood and Mahoney 1990; McDonald and Sidle 1992; Johnson <br />1994). There are also concerns for the effects of grazing or other utilization of floodplain areas <br />by both livestock and wildlife such as deer and beaver, and for how grazing would affect <br />cottonwood reintroduction/recovery efforts (Lindauor -76; Snyder and Miller 1991; <br />Kufeld and Bowden 1995). The primary challenge to the recruitment of cottonwoods is the <br />"attenuation of flooding [that] also prevents the essential geomorphic disturbance that creates <br />new nursery sites" (Mahoney and Rood 1998:635). Cottonwoods are faced with increasing <br />competition from other species such as the introduced kochia, Chinese elm, and Russian olive <br />, <br />(Lindauer 1970:73 -77). <br />Significant floods, including the famous 1921 and 1965 Arkansas River floods that <br />devastated Pueblo and downstream areas, are reported for the years 1904, 1908, 1935, 1937, <br />1942, 1944, 1947, 1955, 1966, 1997, 1999 (USACE1948:24; 1965:29 -30, 1970 :B17 -B23, D9- <br />D12, 1973:48 -49, 1977a:9 -11, 1983a :4/54/8; 1999:5 -9, 13 -15; Lindauer and Ward 1968:3). In <br />the study area, the 1999 spring flood inundated major portions of North La Junta and portions of <br />La Junta and overtopped and damaged the North La Junta levee as well as the Las Animas levee. <br />' <br />Significant damages also occurred along Fountain Creek near towns and cities such as Manitou <br />Springs, Colorado Springs, Fountain, and Pueblo ( USACE 1999b, 1999c, 1999e). <br />Flood events are known to add and distribute. significant amounts of sediments to the <br />river's channel and adjacent overbank areas. In the study area, the primary tributaries to the <br />Arkansas River that are contributing substantial amounts of sediment include Timpas Creek, <br />Horse Creek, Adobe Creek, and the Purgatoire'River. "With the reduction in inflow and the <br />' <br />increase in phreatophytes at the head of the [John Martin] reservoir, there has been a decrease in <br />20 ' 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.